Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Four Wave Mixing

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ZPDM
    replied
    Originally posted by amigo View Post
    ZPDM,

    Thank you for the above post - will you be making more posts like it as I feel there is a wealth of knowledge waiting to be tapped into?

    Personally I'd love to have physician(s) be part of this or any other group and take interest into electromagnetics (and other non-conventionial methods) because very seldom I see scientists cross the boundaries of their disciplines. They are generally locked in their own field of research, and not generally because they would not want to cross it, but because of whatever vested interests pay the bills.

    Also, since I doubt the rest of us here are qualified physicians, having an expert in the medical field (even GP) could greatly add into further research and understanding of why things happen and how, from all points of view be it electrical or medical.

    I also thought about commenting on your post but I feel I'd be preaching to the choir. Besides, my information is what I read elsewhere on the Web and not really my own. I don't like being a parrot when I can help it. Although some of the things you said come to me as common sense because of my background (place I come from) where these things are known among people (baking soda, honey, etc) and are passed generation to generation.
    Thx Amigo and I think your second paragraph sums things up to a T. I realize I am off topic and in future will try to stay closer on topic however as I have John Bedini's welcome and invitation to keep posting I'll say a bit more. If you wish further reading on this here are a few links. For the baking soda in chronic kidney disease here is a free full text review of the literature from the American Journal of Nephrology, March 2012. http://content.karger.com/produktedb...339329&typ=pdf It is a bit dry reading, however the bottom line might be found in the discussion section where it states, "Our analysis revealed a net improvement in GFR of 3.2 ml/min/1.73 m 2 and a 79% risk reduction in the incidence of dialysis requirement by alkali therapy over the time span of the longterm trials. These results have potentially important implications for the clinical course of patients with CKD and the economics of end-stage kidney disease programs." So this was just oral baking soda and the dose about a 1/2 tea spoon in these studies. Chronic Kidney Disease is I believe the sixth most common casuse of mortality in the U.S.

    For the salt and heart disease here is the 2011 Journal of the American Medical Association study. JAMA Network | JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association | Fatal and Nonfatal Outcomes, Incidence of Hypertension, and Blood Pressure Changes in Relation to Urinary Sodium Excretion
    In this large prospective population the quartile of people who ate the most salt (as measured through urinary salt excretion) had 1/5 the number of deaths from cardiovascular disease as the quartile that ate the least salt. The study is important as well in that it is looking at actual heart disease rates (not a surrogate marker such as blood pressure - though the effect on BP wasn't seen as very large in this study either) and the endpoint of death is as clinically relevant as you get. Heart Disease is the number one killer in the U.S. In this large study at least eating more salt decreased deaths from heart disease by 80 percent. The American College of Cardiology still maintains its low salt campaign.

    For vitamin C reading I would recommend Dr. Thomas Levy, MD JD. some of his "Curing the Incurable: Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases and Toxins" is available for free on his website Books by Dr. Levy. Finally here are two reprints of Dr. Edward Klenners work with vitamin C, the first a 1949 paper dealing with his cures of Polio and other virus and the second from 1971 dealing with other therapeutic uses of IV vitamin C.
    Dr. Klenner: C as Polio Cure (1949)
    Klenner 1971 Vitamin C paper

    At some point here I will probably restart my medical blog and will be certain to try and let you know. Thanks for the encouragement.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom C
    replied
    moving on

    Originally posted by ZPDM View Post
    Tom C,

    To be honest I think I was just being defensive because I start to take free energy more seriously and it intimidates me. That said one might make light of casual hero worship. I mean TheGooch and you Tom C (and John Bedini) are my heroes but really should I really go beyond this? By the Way, sorry for taking things off topic.
    enoughsaid. good luck in your research. anyone interested seriously in vitamin research and cancer research, needs to read the gerson therapy, writen by charlotte gerson, and also the book doctor yourself, and the vitmin C cure for cancer. niacin, vitamin c and d are all you need to cure most everthing. IV vitamin C in the 250 to 350 thousand mlligrams dosages daily WILL cure Cancer more often than not. this was done in clinical trials many times over.

    Tom C

    Leave a comment:


  • John_Bedini
    replied
    All IC’s are 555 timers mixers; the pots are for adjusting the frequency’s. (The aero is the wiper on the pot)
    The colors are the wire coming out of the Radio Shack mini Transformer. The capacitors can all be disc type. You may adjust the machine between .8Hz to 8 Hz all resistors can be ¼ watt standard in the industry and 3watt resistors are not required. They can all be 5% good enough. The 386 chip is an amplifier that is used to drive the transformer. The AE, BB, BE were wave shapes I was thinking about at the time. Hope this helps, sorry I missed this post.





    Originally posted by TheGooch View Post
    Hi John,
    I attended the 2012 Conference (my first one) and was blown away. I'm a huge fan. I've been watching your videos and learning electronics with any spare time I can find. You are my hero.

    Now that I finally got to get that off my chest, I have some questions about the schematic:



    1) When I look at the schematic, I see .0047uF and .1 to 8 Cps. I'm assuming the 2 differences in the above quote are typos? Can you please confirm?

    2) Also, on the schematic I see "ORANGE" and "WHITE" but I'm not 100% sure what they are referring to. Above the "ORANGE" and to the left I see an LED, so I was thinking maybe the "ORANGE" was referring to that (a light to say the machine is on). As for the "WHITE", could it be the color of the wire coming out of the Radio Shack transformer (I ordered one but it hasn't arrived yet)?

    3) To the left of the 386 chip, between pin 3 and the 100K pot, what does that arrow pointing up mean? I've tried looking at tons of schematics to find one of these and a description of what it means, but no luck. As I mentioned earlier I'm new to electronics and trying to learn on the fly, so please don't be too harsh.

    4) I noticed some of the capacitors don't have a + or - and some are drawn with a short line and a longer line. I'm assuming the ones on the Phase Gen Mixer should be ceramic capacitors as they don't have polarity from what I understand. Can you please elaborate on the capacitors that should be used (ceramic for Phase Gen, electrolytic for other?, etc.) please?

    5) For the resistors, on one of them you mention it should be 1/4W, what does this mean for the ones that aren't labeled? I've been looking at buying 3W resistors everywhere to be safe but not sure if that's required or if there's a downside to that (from what I can tell, there's no downside but I'd like to be sure before I buy them).

    6) At the bottom of the schematic you have a light drawing of 3 square waves(?) that looks like it says 10v DC, 9.5, and 8.9. Above them are labels AE, BB, and BE. Can you please explain what these are?

    I'm sorry if some of these questions are to 'newbie' but I'm hoping you will help me.

    Thank You for everything you have done and everything you continue to do.

    -Mike Boulet

    Leave a comment:


  • John_Bedini
    replied
    4 Wave Mixing

    Paul,
    You do not need to be intimated by anybody especially by me. I for one am happy you’re into electronics. Even if were in two different fields it is possible that something can come of all this.
    I only share the experiments I have done in this field. I have always looked at the body as one of the best machines built; just think of all the crap it can take. Anyway welcome and post what you want. In my opinion people are free to speak their minds here. Please do post more. If you have any question on what I did then just ask, anyway welcome. In a short answer to you yes someone did. It is worth looking into.
    John B
    Last edited by John_Bedini; 08-29-2012, 09:23 PM. Reason: edit

    Leave a comment:


  • ZPDM
    replied
    Tom C,

    To be honest I think I was just being defensive because I start to take free energy more seriously and it intimidates me. That said one might make light of casual hero worship. I mean TheGooch and you Tom C (and John Bedini) are my heroes but really should I really go beyond this? By the Way, sorry for taking things off topic.

    Leave a comment:


  • ZPDM
    replied
    John,

    You’re my hero for having replied after that. The great majority of my nine years at FDA was spent in an office dedicated to evaluating whether drugs for various rare diseases should get promoted with tax breaks and the like. It was only when I brought my head up long enough to say,”wait you can’t do that” that all hell broke loose. Not sure how I stumbled into your work but from my background of evaluating obscure things I had only just read up on and people promoting treatments for such, when I glanced at and heard yours (and Tom Bearden’s) work my first thought was, these people aren’t liars and while they make no sense to me I don’t believe they are incoherent. So I started diddling in electronics where I have no business and have been surprised at how much progress, relatively speaking, I have made based from what you introduced me to. In the back of my mind I guess I suspected you were just exaggerating a bit, I no longer think that is likely the case and to be quite honest it is a bit intimidating, hence I guess the defensiveness of the last post.

    Re electromagnetics and medicine, first off to be quite honest I don’t think I am yet at the level of being able to speak your language, I mean that sincerely, maybe in a year or two with help. Secondly, physicians often to generally get it wrong it terms of what is actually going on. What is important is did someone get better when such and such was done? There are very few, (though I will look into it) actual trials related to electromagnetic treatments. What stunned me when I had the time to look into the literature is just how much support there is for vitamin/micronutrient/alternative therapies. I’ll try and post some in my response to Amigo.

    I had a great deal on all this on a website while I was doing consulting work, when the government came back and said, you don’t owe us 7 years you owe us 10 years and if not you owe us the full cost of your medical education and training. It is best not to fight such nonsense or overly speculate about it, so in a month or two I will likely, per my direction, start full time work as a general practitioner on an Indian reservation for a year or so. I felt it best not to continue the website at this time, however, I’d like to send along three newsletters on Vitamin C in cancer, Food dyes and water flouridation as (I hope) a small thank you for the new things you’ve given me to think about and explore.

    Ciao,

    Paul

    Leave a comment:


  • blackchisel97
    replied
    Originally posted by John_Bedini View Post
    Branch,
    I understand that, just thought that we could get a little more information, I for one am very interested in vitamin C and D and all the Herbs as that is all I ever used my whole life. The medical companies scour the planet for such things, but just read the fine print to find out the side effects.I have also used some of the machines talked about here. I'm hoping on someone making a discovery with electronic healing. I have seen examples under Microscopes of things being destroyed, with Medical doctors sitting right there, I don't take any offence to anything that is said here, it's for your voice here.
    Same here John. I did study bioelectronics and nuclear medicine back in '80 but all I ever built in this field was an amplifier for measuring potential across the eye. All I use right now is natural remedies. Goldenrod, camomile, propolis, honey, aloe vera - just to name a few have been known for thousands of years. For the past couple of years I also added MMS - activated sodium chlorite to my medicine cabinet.
    Sodium bicarbonate can bring more benefits by changing our ph. Parasites ( I use this term for bacteria and viruses as well) thrive in slightly acidic environment. Cancers among them. I can write some about vitamin C,D (D3 in particular) but don't want to hijack this thread.
    Rife and Beck discoveries can give us more control over our own health and should be reincarnated.
    I'm waiting for audio transformer (we don't have a Radio Shack anymore in Canada) and 18V zener diodes to continue. I have an old electropuncture Russian device from '80 which I've been using to activate or rather stimulate certain receptors. I never attempted to dissect this device .It operates on low DC levels and it came with a map of receptors to be targeted. I can see some similarity with Robert Beck device, while the device you shared shares similarity with heterodyning technique by using modulation of mixed square waves.
    Everything has its unique resonant frequency and there is a treshold beyond which molecular structure will fall apart. We're electrical beings and each and every process in our body relies on potential difference. There is no need to use Tesla Coil. Low potentials can be effective enough and will not affect any vital processes in negative way.
    Just my 2 cents.

    Vtech

    Leave a comment:


  • Branch Gordon
    replied
    I apologize John....I was responding to Tom C's post. I should've replied with a quote.

    Leave a comment:


  • John_Bedini
    replied
    Branch,
    I understand that, just thought that we could get a little more information, I for one am very interested in vitamin C and D and all the Herbs as that is all I ever used my whole life. The medical companies scour the planet for such things, but just read the fine print to find out the side effects.I have also used some of the machines talked about here. I'm hoping on someone making a discovery with electronic healing. I have seen examples under Microscopes of things being destroyed, with Medical doctors sitting right there, I don't take any offence to anything that is said here, it's for your voice here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Branch Gordon
    replied
    I believe he was saying that by complimenting someone you can give them a big head which causes arrogance. So he gave the opposite of a compliment.

    Seemed to be a joke to me, albeit a hard to follow one.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom C
    replied
    Originally posted by ZPDM View Post
    They may be wrong and I may not have read it right but that is not the point, despite your being my elder, I feel obligated to close with, "screw you John, what the hell do you know anyways, nothing!" If on the outside chance you've heard this maybe 10-100 times more than me, as Rosanna, Rosanna Danna said, Nevermind.
    So I am going to make the assumption here you were being sarcastic, I will say it is hard with posts to understand if someone is joking or not. I assume you are comiserating with JB not telling him off.

    Tom C

    Leave a comment:


  • John_Bedini
    replied
    ZPDM,
    Good To Have you here.
    Your right Screw me, but in my years of research I might say with medical doctors, they came to see me for electronics I did not go to them. I can only report what I did find. This is not saying that it will work, just like your drugs do not work in all cases either. So screw you right back. I'm of the opinion to let you have your say here, you might help somebody and maybe not. But your free to speak your mind. On the other hand someone just might make a discovery that does help.

    Leave a comment:


  • amigo
    replied
    ZPDM,

    Thank you for the above post - will you be making more posts like it as I feel there is a wealth of knowledge waiting to be tapped into?

    Personally I'd love to have physician(s) be part of this or any other group and take interest into electromagnetics (and other non-conventionial methods) because very seldom I see scientists cross the boundaries of their disciplines. They are generally locked in their own field of research, and not generally because they would not want to cross it, but because of whatever vested interests pay the bills.

    Also, since I doubt the rest of us here are qualified physicians, having an expert in the medical field (even GP) could greatly add into further research and understanding of why things happen and how, from all points of view be it electrical or medical.

    I also thought about commenting on your post but I feel I'd be preaching to the choir. Besides, my information is what I read elsewhere on the Web and not really my own. I don't like being a parrot when I can help it. Although some of the things you said come to me as common sense because of my background (place I come from) where these things are known among people (baking soda, honey, etc) and are passed generation to generation.
    Last edited by amigo; 08-29-2012, 06:01 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • ZPDM
    replied
    There hasn't been a lot here in this thread for a little while so I thought I might take it off topic as I have zero to add about Mr. Bedini's bug zapper. I'm a physician from the FDA who told the FDA they shouldn't use the drug company's application as the whole of the review, I'll leave it at that and just say the hits just keep on comin. This was a great blessing in disguise however as I went back with the framework I had and began to look at the medical literature on a wide variety of topics. It is astonishing. I do trust that John Bedini is reporting findings of note. The thing with medical literature is it eventually all boils down to giving a treatment or intervention and seeing if someone gets better or worse (i.e clinical trials). These are sadly lacking (though better than fixed) for a number of reasons for anything related to electromagnetics. So I'll just pass along a few unrelated things these are all overwhelmingly supported in the medical literature (The "financial bias" seems to enter once a threat is percieved though there is generally a lack of funds for unprofitable research to start)

    1) This one is new as in the past 3-5 years. Baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) about a half teaspoon a day at least halves the progression of chronic kidney disease. Baking soda was initially looked at in about two dozen studies as a way to cut Ct scan contrast dye (nephropathy) reactions. It worked so well, eventually there were studies looking at it simply in chronic kidney disease. These two or three controlled clinical trials (two controlled clinical trials is the "bar" for FDA approval) were overwhelmingly positive at slowing the progression of kidney disease. Half teaspoon of baking soda costs about 1/3 cent a day. Sodium bicarb, what about the sodium?
    2) A recent very large (dozen MD PHds) study from Europe found increased salt intake more than halved (want to double check that) deaths from heart disease and had little effect on BP. It goes along with previous studies I looked at, will dig out references if anyone requests, but within reason, salt is a health food.
    3) Getting back a little closer to oh wait no, first, honey is per dozens of studies about the best wound dressing possible, it is a tremendous broad spectrum topical (and perhaps oral -though I haven't researched it) anti-viral, anti-microbial.
    4) Okay Vitamin C. There is research published from 70 years ago of a clinician who cured 60 cases of polio in a row with IV vitamin C. He also presented his findings to the AMA, around when Roosevelt was starting the March of dimes... chirp... chirp. IV vitamin C is an astonishingly non-toxic, broad spectrum potent anti-viral, it is also a nearly universal anti-toxin. Again I'm happy to provide references. The issue is dosage. This may (though it has not been formally studied) have been addressed with the recent creation of liposomal vitamin C. Albert Svent-Gyorgi who discovered vitamin C (originally named it "Godnose" as he had no idea what he had found) and got a Nobel for this and other work, became very interested, through free radicals in electromagnetic influences on health. Given the electron transport chain in mitochondria, the polarity of water it certainly appears a neglected area of research. In any event, IV and possibly liposomal vitamin C may do similar things to that which John Bedini reports accomplished, and there is a fair amount of literature to back it up. Oh and vitamin D is good. Vitamin C and D and most people live to 100 and half the disease and suffering is gone, that may not even be an exageration. I used to have a website for all of this and more, but it appears that I will likely spend the next year or two placating the government.

    Alright, in closing, I wish to send along a write-up on vitamin C in cancer but don't know how to link to a local file so will send this along to an administrator. The previous poster mentioned Mr. Bedini as his hero. Now the Desert Father's of (I don't know where Syria maybe) had a saying I read once (I think) where they said if you compliment someone you can lay them open to the attacks of the devil. They may be wrong and I may not have read it right but that is not the point, despite your being my elder, I feel obligated to close with, "screw you John, what the hell do you know anyways, nothing!" If on the outside chance you've heard this maybe 10-100 times more than me, as Rosanna, Rosanna Danna said, Nevermind.

    Leave a comment:


  • amigo
    replied
    @ Tom C,

    John B mentioned above that you took pictures of the Albert Abrams machine he has, would you be able to post the photos up for the rest of us?


    @ John Bedini,

    Your last post sounds intriguing, do you think you could rewrite it into another one in plain English for the rest of us, please?

    Thanks!
    Last edited by amigo; 08-26-2012, 01:40 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X