Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The SG Radiant Oscillator

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Faraday88
    replied
    Ok i'm sorry too..
    i choose not to comment on this any more..
    Rgds,
    Faraday88.

    Leave a comment:


  • John_Koorn
    replied
    Faraday88, you are not making any sense. What has this got to do with the SG Radiant Oscillator??? We are not charging with CONSTANT CURRENT! We are charging the battery with impulses of high voltage, NO current to speak of.

    Sorry if I'm not "catching the concept" here.

    John K.

    Leave a comment:


  • Faraday88
    replied
    Hi,

    I'm Sorry, the Vessel V1 needs to have a constant capacity of Liquid contained in it, and the System which does this corresponds to a constant Power.
    The quantity of the Liquid corresponds to the Current.
    I never said about charging the receive Battery to a Voltage Higher than Source Battery, on the contrary i said the opposite.
    I do'nt need to understand/or expect to be taughton 'Potential Difference' when i already understand the more basic aspect of the Broken symmetry which is fundamental to Voltage defination in Radiant Electricity.
    rgds, Faraday88.

    Leave a comment:


  • John_Koorn
    replied
    Faraday88, so how do you explain where you can fill V2 before V1 is empty? That is not "constant current" right?

    Also how do you explain where you can charge a battery to a higher voltage than the source battery? You don't need to be a couple of volts higher on the source battery than the charge battery. Not if you understand differential potentials.

    John K.

    Leave a comment:


  • Faraday88
    replied
    Micheal,

    Take it this way..... what do we do when we want to fully fill in an empty vessel V 2 with say a liquid....
    we pour the liquid to be filled from another container say V1 which is full to its capacity..right?
    when the liquid is poured in the other container (V2), the status of the result is flipped..that is the V1 is now empty and V2 is now full..
    the same is true in a CONSTANT CURRENT mode of charging the battery , as a constant Current Implies CONSTANT POWER as well (Power= Energyx time), the Potential of the Battrey is 'attained ' as a result of this dump over time in the Conventional mode of CONSTANT CURRENT charging. (of course the Souce Voltage has to be couple of Volts above the Sink Dipole (Receive) Battery).
    Hope you catch up the concept.
    Rgds
    Last edited by Faraday88; 10-29-2012, 08:36 PM. Reason: misses

    Leave a comment:


  • min2oly
    replied
    Perhaps constant source of potential, while realizing/borrowing the least amount of current?
    kind regards,
    Patrick

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael Luton
    replied
    I do not understand that a fully charged battery is a constant current source. As soon as a load is placed across a battery the current causes the battery voltage to decrease, as the voltage decreases across a given load decreases, the current also decreases. E=IxR . So if you are using a qualified statement could you let the those less informed of us know what your qualifiers are so we can understand?

    Leave a comment:


  • Faraday88
    replied
    Originally posted by Faraday88 View Post
    Hi,

    Let me tell you this: I learn'nt Battery charging concept in the Radiant way..and that's what i mean saying 'forgeting' (only if i ever knew what it was in the first place) the fundamentals.
    and belive me its been all there and no one could figure it out (of course JB did it)... in conventional understanding, it
    is called the CONSTANT CURRENT 'SOURCE'.and yes it is as simple as that.

    rgds,
    Faraday88.
    Hi,

    A 'Fully Charged' Battery implies that it is Constant Current (and hence constant Power) charged.
    so, this when used with a Radiant Charger does a double gain between the battaries on the complition of one cycle.
    rgds,
    Faraday88.

    Leave a comment:


  • Faraday88
    replied
    Hi bedini man,

    you are free to choose your motto.....which will soon chage perhaps very soon....

    rgds,
    Faraday88

    Leave a comment:


  • Faraday88
    replied
    Hi,

    Let me tell you this: I learn'nt Battery charging concept in the Radiant way..and that's what i mean saying 'forgeting' (only if i ever knew what it was in the first place) the fundamentals.
    and belive me its been all there and no one could figure it out (of course JB did it)... in conventional understanding, it
    is called the CONSTANT CURRENT 'SOURCE'.and yes it is as simple as that.

    rgds,
    Faraday88.

    Leave a comment:


  • Prinsloo
    replied
    Thanks Faraday88

    Eagerly awaiting your vid and pics.

    Theunis

    Leave a comment:


  • Faraday88
    replied
    Hi Tom C,

    Replacing the Transistor with an Electromechanical switch (Vibrator of the 70's) will make the Radiant Oscillator more apparent in its functioning..and throw more light on the Split-diode mechanism of the Charging.
    Best Regards,
    Faraday88.

    Leave a comment:


  • Faraday88
    replied
    Hi Theunis,
    I suggest you think over the Split-Mechanism of the diode working on Charging a Battrey
    Actually there are several version of the split diode charging, (John describes this in the begning of this thread) like essentially it can be one to as many Battries as one wishes on the secondary side. the concept of the Lamellar currents or branch currents which are asymmetrical between the two nodes (Polarities).
    as J.B already stated, each of the battery will behave indepandently based on its impedance and the charging takes place accordingly.
    i will soon post pics, video of my replication for all.

    Thank you,
    Rgds,
    Faraday88.

    Leave a comment:


  • bediniman
    replied
    HaHa John I just have to say I love the new sign about theory and practice I'm still chuckling I think it will be my new motto!
    Last edited by bediniman; 10-23-2012, 08:59 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Prinsloo
    replied
    Hi Faraday88

    This is good, looked like you had a Monologue with your self there for a while, (look at all the post ), did not want to spoil your train of though there for a moment - as I did not have anything to contribute then.

    Would it be possible to enlighten the not have PHD's amongst us with a circuit diagram, as to understand what you have done,

    I have tried the split diode of JohnB on two totally different sized FLA batteries, it was like they where seesawing up the voltages, first the one then the other, until they where both nearly full.

    Thanks

    Theunis

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X