The SG Radiant Oscillator

[min2oly]

Hi Tom,

I just finished a picaxe controlled pulser instead of the comparator version. Is there a guide to choosing the size of cap for the pulser in relation to the battery size? If it is just about potential difference, does it means that the cap size is not important?

I like to think about it in terms of Volts and Amps, then look at how many amp pulses JB is putting to his various battery banks. I would love to hear more comments on this. I feel I am shooting in the dark on this as usual It would be nice to know if there is a general rule as per impedance or Ah. Then if you know how many amps each pulse should have for a given battery, it would be easy to choose the cap. Trial and error for now... at least I don't have many different banks to charge.
kind regards,
Patrick

[Wei]

Hi Tom,

I just finished a picaxe controlled pulser instead of the comparator version. Is there a guide to choosing the size of cap for the pulser in relation to the battery size? If it is just about potential difference, does it means that the cap size is not important?

[vallentin]

@Faraday
1) Look here: Update On Lead Zinc Alum Cells and see for yourself how it goes negative on the scope. MJL goes more negative than that. And that's what we are after! Negative energy because is good for charging your battery for cheap of the cheap.
Mr.Bedini is a well versed amplifiers builder. HE KNOWS what works or doesn't. He even built his own transistors at one time because there were no such devices on the market similar to what he was trying to achieve. Ask yourself this: why would a grown man go every day in the desert, collect stones and rocks, grind them and study their properties? So!
Don't waste your time on a dead end.
Mosfets and IGBT's have their own use and puspose. MJL's as well. As it happens, MJL21194 is the best device for this particular circuit.
Build the machine as you are told, don't change anything and you will have results.
Remember! We're not after high currents.

Current=heat=bad for the battery=losses=expensive
High potential=cold=gain=cheap=good for the battery.

We need high potential to get the ions moving into the battery and therefore, creating their own current. And not paying for that process big bucks.
The purpose of this circuit is to tune it for minimum current draw, get max results out of this process and LEARN.
Do that!
Think of this: charging your car battery for 40-60W in total/day, for which you pay dollars and get 1200W in total from your inverter.
Substract 40-60W from 1200W and see what you gain in your pocket. How's that sound to you?
So, after you have it running/working and a bit of understanding on what this machine really is, feel free to burn your precious Mosfets and IGBT's by changing the circuit, but don't expect us to pet you on the back for your loss...
Man, I've built my first SSG with junk transistors and junk parts. And still works.
2) Forget it. Why would you want to add capacitance into the circuit? What is the reason for litzing the coil then? Huh?
Do your homework, Faraday. And if you can, buy those DVD's. You will understand why.
3) Ring, ring?

“RING THE BELL TWICE” Ed’s saying.

NASA’s Moon Boots. PMH. Polarity change in an electro magnet.
The electro magnet on/off. (this is what we are told in schools). What we want is once the electro magnet is turned on, we hold this energy with no more power input, like in the PMH of Ed’s then we never let it go. Like moon boots we just want to use a small signal to switch polarity back and forth. All that is needed is a Small signal to switch the polarity. Makes push/pull effect on johns motor w/no back EMF. With running motor can run a generator coil that makes way more energy that the energy needed to run the push/pull switching system.

“RING THE BELL TWICE!”

Glad to be of help
Valentin

[Faraday88]

Hi Tom C ,

Thanks for your extended support in this regard! some doubts though:

1) What do you mean by saying 'with the monopole stick with the mjl- it goes negative' need to know what you meant in the highlighted here.
2)Can we not interface a BJT to drive either the MOFETS or the IGBTS just my speculations...what probelms do we face in such a situation (time delays due to Capacitance effect ect.. in Gate drive circuit)
3) Please throw some light on "ring the bell twice"

Thanks again in advance...
P.S : My personal promise to you that i will soon show some progress in work and share to all
Best Regards,
Faraday88.

[Tom C]

Farady,

with the monopole stick with the mjl- it goes negative. fets dont switch the way you want. been down that road. you can use the igbt in other hi current switching circuits, I have never used them too expensive to blow up.
with a cap pulser you can use an SCR or a fet switched on the negative, as it is the cap dump that goes negative in the battery, "ring the bell twice" it was said on someones door. the lead acid battery in the monopole circuit cannot be stressed enough, its half of the "magic" not sure yet about alums.
the difference in pulsed DC is you use the potential not the current. you switch after the ions move and before the elctrons move, thereofore creating a time based unidirectional time wave that stresses the aether, and pulse the dipole into the circuit. the info is contained in the spike. you need a little bit of current to get the front end working in classic EE parlance, but the back end is all radiantly powered when done right.

looking forward to your work!
Tom C

[min2oly]

Hi Tom C,

Can you suggest me a schematic to use IGBT or MOSFET transistors in SSG application.?
please help me on this.
Rgds,
Faraday88.

http://www.energyscienceforum.com/bedini-monopole-3-beginners/30-basic-monopole-diagram.html

I recommend: Do not try to "improve" what is already known or you will not find what you already understand.

kind regards,
Patrick

[Faraday88]

Hi Tom C,

Can you suggest me a schematic to use IGBT or MOSFET transistors in SSG application.?
please help me on this.
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[Faraday88]

Hi Tom C,

Very well, as i stated earlier, i have decided to stop all the rants/lectures/theory ect. in this thread it will be my Machine which will speak out for themselves and prove to all what i really have undersdtood (which i know i have).
and let me tell you that its all Interpretational Physics out there! it was my effort to share the Interpretation to the best of my abaility to help other and not an intention to mislead others in the forum.
if you think for a while that you can question me on my understaning on RESONANCE than tell me how do you differenciate between the Transverse (Known and estabilshed in main stream Physics) Resonance and Longitudal (This was recognised by Tesla) Resonance? the former was not even considered and was denounced when the later was Discorved and a new understanding to 'RESONANCE' was relaized in terms of PULSE- ELECTRICITY.
i'll stop here....sorry for that little rant again..i know i get carried away at times.. pardon me Sir!
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[Tom C]

Tom C ,

You guys do'nt even consider me to be true disciple to John Bedini.....

rgds,
Faraday88

untrue..... we dont know you. I have never seen you post anywhere under your current name, unless it is on energeticforum.com and I dont remember it there.

never seen your "handle" before
dont know your real name
not seen any of your machines
you were not on the monopole groups under faraday88
you use fairly esoteric language to describe fairly simple processes, that have always been adequately described by TB and JB, especially in the impulse technology DVD.
conditioning magnets has nothing to do with the monopole
your posts hint at a misunderstanding of the dipole and the quantum state

been to any of the conferences? if so we have met I think or at least you know who I am, you however are an enigma when it comes to JB's work. if you have been lurking for years that is your perogative. if you have a physical disability which prevents you from building machines please say so. even guy (muzzy) who suffered a severe stroke does his best to produce work.

simply put the moderators of this section of the forum are not fond of people who share theory AND dont show their work. the bedini forum is a builders forum. now I am not saying there is not a place for theoretical physicists in this arena, but even Tom Bearden whom I regard with very hi esteem had all of his designs and theories placed into the real world thru machines, like the meg.

the monopole is a "finished" technology, it is a matter of tweaking the patent to meet your needs, if you understand potential and resonant circuits, and how transistors work, you are more than half way there.

so please show the work, thats all we ask. the circuits dont do what you think they will do, when the radiant enters all bets are off.

Tom C

[Faraday88]

Tom C ,

You guys do'nt even consider me to be true disciple to John Bedini.....

rgds,
Faraday88

[Tom C]

Hi Tom,
Thanks a million! i'm amazed at your interpretation which is very much like John Bedini.
My personal selute to you...
Rgds,
Faraday88.

JB is my college proff....

Tom C

[Faraday88]

Hi Tom,
Thanks a million! i'm amazed at your interpretation which is very much like John Bedini.
My personal selute to you...
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[Tom C]

Guys can't you spot a trouble maker yet? Monologuer waiting for some attention.

yea I can spot em a mile away... fun to turn the cranks, waiting for him to show some work, and not just babble on about theory.....

Tom C

[Wei]

Guys can't you spot a trouble maker yet? Monologuer waiting for some attention.

[Tom C]

Hi,

I'm Sorry, the Vessel V1 needs to have a constant capacity of Liquid contained in it, and the System which does this corresponds to a constant Power.
The quantity of the Liquid corresponds to the Current.
I never said about charging the receive Battery to a Voltage Higher than Source Battery, on the contrary i said the opposite.
I do'nt need to understand/or expect to be taughton 'Potential Difference' when i already understand the more basic aspect of the Broken symmetry which is fundamental to Voltage defination in Radiant Electricity.
rgds, Faraday88.

the secret to broken symmetry is the LACK of current, massless charge a phi delta 0 look at lohns pages of the original free energy machine (watson replicated it) look at the drawing, there is a vertical pulse positive and a descending vertical pulse negative, which cancel each other out, what we are left with is the info contained in the spike, massles charge. its all in Johns DVD's all about the spike.

Tom C