Bedini G-Field / Kromrey Converter Questions for Peter and John

[Ajay]

So I have come to understand something else about the Kromrey that I would like to share. Both the magnetic path and the conductive pathways in the closed loop of magnetic flux need to be set up correctly. In other words, forelle had it right about BaFe magnets being NON CONDUCTIVE. The iron needs to be electrically isolated and the BaFe magnets allow that condition. My design incorporated aluminum attached to the iron leading to eddy currents and loss of electrical isolation. I have to machine a piece of wood to the same dimensions and try that. It was also suggested (by a friend of mine in the FE community) that the iron attached to my magnets on the rotor of my machine need to be electrically isolated from the brass armature as well. This is because the magnets are the stator in my design in order to keep the coils stationary. I will try to fix my conductive issues and I will keep you updated.

[forelle]

Hi Ajay,
The difference between Strontium-ferrite and Barium-ferrite is that Barium is not conductive.Walter Rosenthal said you need this material for the VTA to probably create an Elektret.I dont know why its necessary for the Kromrey.Important is that you have 2 Bloch-walls wich are standing 90 dgrees to each other.Why dont you use the wire Bedini sugested,3x18 gauge and 130 feet for each coil.This should only be hints.

[Faraday88]

Hi Ajay,
Yes you said it! In fact to fail is to succeed in another way to try which one would work! that is what it is all about...when you uncover what fails, it redirects you to what would work...but one thing here is your intuitive guess.. Bedini did not stumble on these things either.. he studied them for 30+ years and even now he is studying more intricate aspect of Radiant Matter (Crystal voltaics ect...)I personally salute and learn to be determined like him.. Peter Lindeman is the other person on the same track...Aaron is the next. And so on.. ok enough on the this..
I can pin point on what you should be doing to get what you are looking for, but that will be like hampering your own approach.. don't get me wrong on this please. We all have to see, get and be blessed in what we are for..
Heard Bedini saying ..'people must learn through the dark ages and when the light glows, even a 25w bulb powered in total darkness is bright enough! and to enlighten the 'secrete' of the pondered matter.
Next I will say the gauge of wire is immaterial, In fact it can be made with a combination of gauges to show you something else of use some where else...
I will say Use is a Blessing but to quench a need is a Curse ..
good luck,
bye for now.
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[Ajay]

[erfinder]

I can't seem to understand what you are getting at Faraday.

I had my coils wound with 32 turns of 14 gauge wire on each stator in order to achieve a high impedance. I then self looped it and although it may have increased RPM when I did this, there was no frosting over of the components. I then hooked up a battery and let it run with the battery connected to the output, but the battery did not turn cold. Yesterday I rewound my coils with 300 turns of 32 gauge wire and connected it to a AC to DC rectifier, then I ran my small solid state tesla coil off of the output. To my dismay, nothing anomalous happened. I am starting to think that it is because my design is different from Bedini's, even though it uses the same principles. I tried to upload pictures of my unit but it wont let me, this is the same idea though- http://www.icestuff.com/~energy21/proto_k2.jpg

Any advice as to what I am doing wrong is appreciated.

You asked for advice, you didn't specify if the advice was to come from anyone in particular, I offer the following.....

Stop listening to Faraday, listen to the machine. Stop looking for your batteries going cold. The image you reference is well known, and reveals only a very interesting waveform, follow the waveform. The patent, two actually, say nothing about cold batteries, should be seen as a sign, a sign that the inventor has no intention of patenting the method which leads to batteries icing up. Believing that cold current exists isn't going to make it manifest any faster. What you are looking for is a phantom, found by only a select dedicated few, I have yet to cross paths with one, chances are they don't frequent places where the profane hang out.


Regards

[Ajay]

I can't seem to understand what you are getting at Faraday.

I had my coils wound with 32 turns of 14 gauge wire on each stator in order to achieve a high impedance. I then self looped it and although it may have increased RPM when I did this, there was no frosting over of the components. I then hooked up a battery and let it run with the battery connected to the output, but the battery did not turn cold. Yesterday I rewound my coils with 300 turns of 32 gauge wire and connected it to a AC to DC rectifier, then I ran my small solid state tesla coil off of the output. To my dismay, nothing anomalous happened. I am starting to think that it is because my design is different from Bedini's, even though it uses the same principles. I tried to upload pictures of my unit but it wont let me, this is the same idea though- http://www.icestuff.com/~energy21/proto_k2.jpg

Any advice as to what I am doing wrong is appreciated.

[Faraday88]

Hi Ajay,

Look, it goes like this.....Faraday's Laws apply to Transverse Electromagnetism in a way, having said that it does apply to Longitudinal as well but with Inverted Functions between Space and Time, here we are dealing with both Transverse and Longitudinal Electromagnetism. that is where Tesla contributes Experimentally..
you are still correct when you say that you achieve High -Impedance with Thick coils...this is Inverted or Asymmetrical which ever way you define it! Cold -electricity is produced this way! you are to achieve High-Voltage even with moderate number of turns does that give you a clue of what is happening????
it is Cold Current and not Cold Voltage!!!!
Keep up the spirit of self-asking the correct Scientific Questions and the answers are before you!!
Best Regards,
Faraday88.

[Ajay]

Faraday88-
Your help in understanding the principles involved in the proper construction of this apparatus is greatly appreciated. I found Faradays law to be an interesting read. By increasing the frequency and the turns of coil, I should be able to get cold electricity out. Tesla spoke about similar phenomena where the output of his rotary spark gap at a certain frequency (mhz range) caused the coils to magnify the output with each turn of copper.

This also points out my other error. By using a low gauge wire, I reduced the surface area of copper exposed to a dielectric. Radiant energy fields collect only on the surface of conductors exposed to dielectrics. This means that they are inherently high frequency and high voltage due to the skin effect. I will rewind my coils with several hundred turns of a high gauge wire and see if that does the trick.

[Faraday88]

G-Field Generator

Hi Ajay,
I must say that you have had a close study of the G-Field Generator, but again you have to get a bit closer than this!!!!
About the Sweet 's device, if you have read his 'Nothing is something' article it speaks about the Motional E-Field, and what it has to do with Motion..!
now again Sweet's work is closely related to JB's SG as well.... I studied JB saying 'you always wanted to move the Magnets across the coil..''
Faraday saw one Thing for the Electromagnetic Induction and made it a Law. There are things hidden in these words. Think and you will have them uncovered for you
About the Magnets type:
You know it really does not matter what type of Magnets you use for the G-Field...even Neos work great.. but the trade off is that Magnets other Than BaFe, others are mostly Electrically conductive, and this is a big No for the G-Field Magnetic Circuit. Magnetic Saturation caused by Strong Neos DO NOT MATTER for the G-Field, Magnetic Saturation is a phenomenon associated with Conduction Current and not Induction Currents!the First is Faradic and the later is Teslain!!Othet than this you are absolutely correct in what you have described..
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[erfinder]

My opinion, self oscillation is the secret of secrets. Here is some speculation. I believe Sweet experienced a self-oscillating phenomena in his work, I think this was mentioned, and I believe it. Seeing the importance of this effect I believe he developed a circuit in which he could manipulate certain key parameters and cause the circuit to self-oscillate. I believe he studied this for years, perfecting his understanding of the phenomena. I think that at some point in his research the need to protect his work became apparent. At this point, as a means for protecting, through complicating the process, he may have looked into finding a means for causing a permanent magnet to self-oscillate like the coils did in his circuit, if this speculating is anywhere near reality, and he succeeded, he was a genius.

If we were to attempt to make a Sweet style magnet today, and it were supposed to oscillate, I would think, and this is just me, I think the self oscillating circuit would be needed to polarize the magnetic material, and not this crap that we are being told was his process. The problem we are confronted with is we are clueless as to what a "real" self oscillating circuit looks like, and because of this, can only speculate about what he was doing.

Regarding the Ferris wheel, you don't need fancy magnets. Funny thing is, the Ferris wheel teaches about self oscillation......but what do I know....


Regards

[Nofear]

Hey Ajay,
If you had self-oscillating magnets you wouldn't need a G-field generator or kromrey converter or anything else. Just stick a copper wire next to it and collect your free current, right?
With the G field machine you're not pursuing magnetic field oscillation as much as abrupt field interruption. One of the three conditions to extract energy from the vacuum is to create a sharp gradient.

JB did mention using fancy magnets in his ferries wheel, it's my opinion that they are not necessary to have a successful replication. But then again what do I know.

NoFear

[Ajay]

Thank you for your input Faraday88. I am assuming you have built a working cold electricity model of this device and know the principles involved in making it. From my current point of understanding, these are the principles involved:
-The magnetic flux must be in a closed loop, where all north pole magnets lead to south pole magnets
-The iron needs to be highly magnetic
-The longitudinal magnetic potential around the iron rises to a maximum and a minimum each time the magnets lock on and break off from the iron, resulting in AC with perfect sine waves
-The further the magnet is from the iron, the lower the efficiency
-The higher the ohmic resistance of the coil, the HIGHER the efficiency
-The lower the gauge of the wire, the higher the amperage and, therefore, the lower the voltage output
-The iron can be the interrupting piece between the iron cored coils and the U shaped electro magnet/permanent magnet, this will lead to higher efficiency
The unknown aspect about this machine are the type of magnets used and if they are necessary. Do you need BaFe magnets because of the self oscillation effect that Sweet discovered?

[Faraday88]

Hi Ajay,

Great News...! Yes you are correct on what you said on how the Coils are wound and how you draw the 'power' from the resulting coil formation! although you are in the right direction
I must say at this point in time that you are not yet there.. to see the Cold-Electricity! it requires something more to where you are think..... think ..I'm sure you will get it right.! yes this is other than the fact that it has to be Flux -gate switched..! when you strike the bulls eye, you will get 120% of what you put to make it run...this is the elementary of the G-Field, the next will take you to 360% and so on....remember Bedini saying in the video that 420 % is the INDUSTRY STANDARD for anything to be declared as a FREE ENERGY or overunity Machine!!
I did the same thing years back when I was studying Bedini's years of pondering work, and than I first set the explanation on how it worked even before I built one to get to work the way I speculated it to be..yes if you are able to explain you are able to get it right... I have been saying for long time that the G-Field is the genesis for all the Bedini Motor -Generator variants.
more later,
Bye for now,
Faraday88.

[Ajay]

The use of BaFe magnets allows for self oscillation of the magnetic fields if the magnet is a good specimen and it is conditioned right( per Floyd Sweet's method). The barium is what allows for self oscillation. I have just made my first G Field replication and I am running preliminary tests. I can tell you that the coils need to be wound in the opposite directions from each other. This is very important. My design incorporates Neodymium magnets, so far, I am getting only room temperature operation. I will be running some tests to make sure the energy is cold and not hot. I will be uploading videos on youtube to publicly track my progress with this machine so I will post links when I get a chance . I believe everyone should open source this project so we dont all have to spend a small fortune on our devices. Mine has costed me $3500 to date. Good luck and have fun,
Ajay

[forelle]

Hi all
here you can get real Bariumferrit magnets

http://www.fehrenkemper.de/rohmagnete/hartferrit.php

They are not allowed to tell the exact formula but its only Barium without Strontium.