Kromrey Disclosure - Bedini SG - Beyond the Advanced Handbook by Peter Lindemann

[Faraday88]

Yes, it's definitely not anti-Lenz Law, it's using Lenz's Law to our benefit.

Hi Aaron,
Anti-Lenz law is a misnomer and a lingo of the mainstream understanding of 'Free Energy' it directly violets the second law of thermodynamics..
Thermodynamics limits its explanation of the difference between Energy and Power.
Best Regards,
Faraday88.

[Aaron Murakami]

This is not Anti-Lenz Law..its just its presence and disappearance from one moment to the next.

Yes, it's definitely not anti-Lenz Law, it's using Lenz's Law to our benefit.

[Faraday88]

I'll post 2 more vids following this on the same topic soon.

Hi Aaron,
Just wanted to emphasis on the Philosophy of this type of the Low-Drag Generator, In the Advanced book it is mentioned that Raymond Kromrey did indeed call it as the 'Ferromagnetic Generator' this supported by the fact that has to do with the Nature of the Eddy Current and its Magnetic field induced in the core.
I have been long since my younger days pondering on the Nature of Eddy current themselves and on how they dissipate power (used in Induction heating).
all along it prompted me on the Longitudinal nature of Electromagnetic Interaction since a physical 'short' is not what is required to cause a current to flow that manifest the dissipation in the bulk of a conductor (core). Hence instead of calling these as Eddy Currents it might well be called as Eddy Magnetic Field or even 'Asymmetrical Eddy current' that is most suited to explain the kromray generator which results in speeding up the rotor. This is not Anti-Lenz Law..its just its presence and disappearance from one moment to the next.
But nonetheless your presentation is just Superb!!
Best Regards,
Faraday88.

[Faraday88]

Absolutely correct faraday, Thank you for that. I meant impedance and wrote inductance for some reason, but yes he said something about how it was important for impedance to be kept under a certain amount and drew the way he did it. truthfully could never figure out what he meant about geometry unless he stacked pancake coils to make each coil.

Hi Bradly,
You have infact got it right when you said that the coils are wound are in a pancake fashion..does that not tell you the difference between the Kromery and the G-field then??..winding a bifilar in the same plane is the key to the geometry and that's the flat pancake..but it does'nt end here...recall the video..JB shows a Trifilar to reduce the Impedance and that is Trifilar on each leg of the rotor coil. its the combined result of the effective impedance of the trifilar coils that is the G-field Generator a refinement done by JB to the kromery design... again there can be a further enhancement to the coil geometry to better the G-field coils..and that would give us a COP of 3.6 and so on...i'm after that...
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[Bradley Malone]

Hi Bradley,
Just to clarify and correct you... its LOW IMPEDENCE and not LOW INDUCTANCE.. is what John meant..and that's what Tesla taught us on how to wind Coils..( Tesla Patent Coils for Electromagnets).
Geometry is very essesntial again.. Aaron clarify's why the cone shape..in the Video i guess.. so that it does'nt get obstructed by the magnet pole pieces during rotation.
Rgds,
Faraday88.

Absolutely correct faraday, Thank you for that. I meant impedance and wrote inductance for some reason, but yes he said something about how it was important for impedance to be kept under a certain amount and drew the way he did it. truthfully could never figure out what he meant about geometry unless he stacked pancake coils to make each coil.

[Faraday88]

John did that because if they were the same on both ends, the diameter of the bobbin at the end would hit the iron laminates. He could have left them cylindrical and extended the core out I suppose but he didn't. Each of the 4 coils on the Kromrey have a single winding so I don't believe what he was referring to applies to this.

Hi Aaron,
This Tappering shape is missing in the coils wound in the DVD G-field Generator video..the gap between the pole pieces and the rotor coils is also small.
the windings are evenly spread on the core.
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[Faraday88]

AAron after watching that video I'm left with a question. the way the coils are wound with the inner face having more mass and the outer having less...like a cone coil. Is that what John meant about coil geometry along with a low inductance trifilar wind?

Hi Bradley,
Just to clarify and correct you... its LOW IMPEDENCE and not LOW INDUCTANCE.. is what John meant..and that's what Tesla taught us on how to wind Coils..( Tesla Patent Coils for Electromagnets).
Geometry is very essesntial again.. Aaron clarify's why the cone shape..in the Video i guess.. so that it does'nt get obstructed by the magnet pole pieces during rotation.
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[Aaron Murakami]

Thank you for clarifying that. In the Kromrey video he talks about the coils needing to have a very low inductance. And he drew it out with more windings and I believe he said it wouldn't work unless you did that or that was an important part of it. So I'm guessing both still produce effects or you wouldn't be showing us....but now I'm confused. Guess I'll have to get building and figure it out!

It's been a while since I've seen his Kromrey presentation, will have to check it out.

[Bradley Malone]

Each of the 4 coils on the Kromrey have a single winding so I don't believe what he was referring to applies to this.

Thank you for clarifying that. In the Kromrey video he talks about the coils needing to have a very low inductance. And he drew it out with more windings and I believe he said it wouldn't work unless you did that or that was an important part of it. So I'm guessing both still produce effects or you wouldn't be showing us....but now I'm confused. Guess I'll have to get building and figure it out!

[Aaron Murakami]

I'll post 2 more vids following this on the same topic soon.

[Aaron Murakami]

AAron after watching that video I'm left with a question. the way the coils are wound with the inner face having more mass and the outer having less...like a cone coil. Is that what John meant about coil geometry along with a low inductance trifilar wind?

John did that because if they were the same on both ends, the diameter of the bobbin at the end would hit the iron laminates. He could have left them cylindrical and extended the core out I suppose but he didn't. Each of the 4 coils on the Kromrey have a single winding so I don't believe what he was referring to applies to this.

[Bradley Malone]

AAron after watching that video I'm left with a question. the way the coils are wound with the inner face having more mass and the outer having less...like a cone coil. Is that what John meant about coil geometry along with a low inductance trifilar wind?

[Faraday88]

I posted a video of the Kromrey in the blog:

http://emediapress.com/2017/12/20/kr...n-shorted-out/

Superb!! Aaron,...your presentation was as good as Peter's..
Just to note that the Kromery design was improvised by JB (I personally call the kromery convertor as the first order of G-field coil) and then became the 'G-field'..in the DVD JB does'nt emphasis much on naming it so..(i remember JB stating that the Coil's field is infact a Gravity wave convertor at 90 Degrees) in the same video he states a COP of 1.2 for that perticular machine but goes on saying that it can be scaled up to 3.60 by 'altering' the coil geometry...i seriously feel there is indeed no limitation to the level to which this scaling up can be acheived.. wonder what is the next step..??
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[Ed_Morbus]

Thanks for sharing

[Aaron Murakami]

I posted a video of the Kromrey in the blog:

http://emediapress.com/2017/12/20/kromrey-generator-speeds-up-when-shorted-out/