John Bedini's Magnetic Model

[Faraday88]

Cloverleaf vs non-Cloverleaf one.

Hi Aaron,
Not quite sure about what you wanted to say that occasion, but here is my explanation, moving magnet with no relative displacement to itself is a situation of the Homopolar generator and Longitudinal in nature (D.C) that is when I say that Faraday actually discovered the Longitudinal counterpart of the Electromagnetic Interaction well before Tesla did it. on the internet, it describes the Homopolar generator as an effect that is paradoxical to the Transverse Electromagnetic Induction.it is not
Under the dynamic state, the Bloch wall of a magnet 'Opens' the Lines of force of Magnetic Induction tubes and become a part of the electric lines of force emanating from the Bloch wall region. it is this electric lines of force that is coupled to the spike field in the SSG coil's collapse and additive to the charging process via the Tesla impulse process (Inductive alone)
bidirectional electrical stress potential.
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[Aaron Murakami]

Cloverleaf vs non-Cloverleaf one.

[Faraday88]

For years I mentioned the SG is an oscillating gas pump, because that is basically what it is.

Coil charges and when it collapses, it sucks some of the potential from the magnetism of the permanent magnets and adds that to the output of the transient spike. Nature likes to fill voids or put things back into equilibrium so the magnet is instantly replenished to bring it back to balance. This happens whether it is in repulsion or attraction mode - it is sucking from the primary field or the "scalar" field between the magnets. I asked John about this about 15 years ago because that is the impression I got and he confirmed that was essentially the case.

What is significant about the Bloch Wall that he is always referencing is that it is the place where the aether enters. I never knew about the Bloch wall at the time, just thought that the magnet polarized the aether around it like any other dipole. It basically does, but instead of my simple understanding at the time with the typical lines of flux drawing, which is so simple but deceptive, it is much more complex, dynamic and beautiful.

John would say the pumping action on the magnet from the coil's field manipulates the Bloch wall (moves it) and at the Bloch wall, that is where the aether enters. That is the point where there is a Zero Force, Antigravity, Null Force, Zero Vector and about a half a dozen other names for the exact same thing.

I don't recall off hand if John just said it simply what it equates to, but it basically means the permanent magnet is a source of potential energy that can be used to do work in a circuit - such as in the transient spike sent to a capacitor for discharge or to a battery to charge it directly.

John has basically said this quite a few times in so many words in quite a few places, moving the Bloch wall, the Null Point, etc... and how vacuum energy enters there. I'm not saying anything that many of you that have been around for a while probably don't already know because John has indeed said these things, but it is a significant part of the overall model.

There are two basic type of "magnetic" drawings that John has posted about the field around magnets and coils - does anyone know the real distinction between them or what these two types of drawings actually represent? He used both in different contexts and sometimes used them to represent a magnetic field in general and sometimes he used them specifically to show something different. I'll eventually point it out

I hope to see some opinions and comments on what John has said about the Bloch Wall AND what the two magnetic fields are that I'm referencing. If you don't know the reference, look at all his diagrams and it may jump out at you.

Aaron,

With Reference to your comment: ''There are two basic type of "magnetic" drawings that John has posted about the field around magnets and coils - does anyone know the real distinction between them or what these two types of drawings actually represent? He used both in different contexts and sometimes used them to represent a magnetic field in general and sometimes he used them specifically to show something different. I'll eventually point it out

I hope to see some opinions and comments on what John has said about the Bloch Wall AND what the two magnetic fields are that I'm referencing. If you don't know the reference, look at all his diagrams and it may jump out at you''.

First of all, the diagram JB showed for the Mono-pole motor are all under dynamic conditions ie. the mono-pole structure in motion.(4D)
With regards to his standard diagram with representations Q1 Q2 Q3.... are Scalar additives with the accelerating speed of the mono-pole motor.
The Lines of force of the 'Magnetic' Field are in essence Electric Field lines of force that couple with the Spike's field of a SG/SSG motor operation. there is more of a 'contact' interaction between adjacent 'opposing' magnets (N-N).
The next crux is the Electrically conductive rotor that is the Scalar 'SOUTH'.
In my previous posts, I indicated the structure of the Magnetic Field to be directional.. with further experimentation, i realized that this configuration requires 3 coils and 4 types of geometrical orientation of the magnet to make the two couple the most. [what every body misses here is the fact that a conducting mass under rotation/Spin produces a net Magnetic dipole moment along its axis of rotation (like the Earth)further,the Magnetic field so produced is a different form of a Magneto-static field compared to that of a Bar magnet. but this Field is DC because the motion is unidirectional. the corresponding 'earth current'(magnetic currents or stubble field currents) are distributed in gradient over its different layers, the nature of these currents are also different from conduction current or Ampere current but they are DC characterized again due to the nature of their production, i.e Directional extraneous motion. It is these 'earth currents' spewed from the rotor that is translated as additive Scalar(Q1 Q2 Q3...) N-Pole in the space around the rotating rotor.
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[Faraday88]

Planetary Magneto, Homopolar, Monopole, Gravity wave, and the Vacuum Field.

A magnetostrictive generation or Magnetic field produced by Gravitating motion (Gravity wave converter)

The Earth's magnetic field seems to be a Spatial(not forward and backward time rate) reverse effect of the Homopolar motor action(Converted Generator), In the sense that the associated motion creates a net Magnetic dipole moment at right angles to the direction of motion.
The dynamically produced Magnetostatic field has an altered Bloch wall which is also 'Dynamically static' unlike in the bar magnet which is 'Statically dynamic'! or that produced by an electric current or by Mono pole interaction.
'Dynamically static' here means thermal energy exhibited at the Bloch wall and the corresponding effects observed at the poles are just the opposite of this mechanism..counteraction to this which is cooling at the poles (The Arctic and The Antarctic regions)
The 'Homopolar' nomenclature refers only to the electrical homogeneity of the conductor, the Magnetic field associated is still Dipolar in its geometry.
Does a spinning conducting object evoke a net Magnetic dipole moment of 'DC' origin?

https://www.apexmagnets.com/news-how-tos/the-magnetic-fields-of-our-solar-system/

I think there is more to be known than there is to be settled with what is assumed about Gravity/Electricity/Magnetism/and the Aether (vacuum of Space.
Rgds,
Faraday88

[Faraday88]

Conductor Rotor for the monopole

Hi Aaron,
Very well...I just realized what i meant to show at that time..however, now i have an advanced understanding of what i intended to show here.. now its irrelavant..
Thanks anyways!!
Rgds,
Faraday88.

@All,
There is a whole different picture to the Monopole aspect of the SSG/SG machine.. when one studies the difference when the machine is run using a Dielectric/non-conducting and a Conductor Rotor , does it strike to anyone that there are two Mono poles here the Scalar S-pole represented by the CONDUCTOR ROTOR at the centre and the N-pole (normal ) represented by a DIELECTRIC(non-conducting) Magnet.
Please try this experiment and let me know what more you guys learn...BTW this also tells you why JB insisted for the peripheral Magnets have to be of Bafe and not Neodymium.... This revelation also marries the monopole with another motor know in another similar name..any guess!!!
Best Regards,
Faraday88.

[Faraday88]

For post #6 - it shows as a post by Minoly with a youtube video. Different than what you are description. Please post the permalink for that post, it is at the top right corner of the post with the #____ - I need the url.

Thanks.

Hi Aaron,
Very well...I just realized what i meant to show at that time..however, now i have an advanced understanding of what i intended to show here.. now its irrelavant..
Thanks anyways!!
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[Aaron Murakami]

Hi Aaron,
Here below is the attachment details if you could retrive it for me..its for the post no.6 of the same thread here.
Rgds,
Faraday88

Hi Guys,
Here is another view of the 'True' Monopole RotorAttachment 5939
you may compare this with what is present in the JB website drawn by jb him self, it isdifferent only slightly..let me know where is the difference you see in these two..?
Rgds,
Faraday88

For post #6 - it shows as a post by Minoly with a youtube video. Different than what you are description. Please post the permalink for that post, it is at the top right corner of the post with the #____ - I need the url.

Thanks.

[Faraday88]

I saw your help request about an attachment. I emailed you and it said the account is no longer valid. Please check your account settings that you have an updated email. For attachments, you should be able to open them all when logged in. What is the link to the message with an attachment that you can't open?

Hi Aaron,
Here below is the attachment details if you could retrive it for me..its for the post no.6 of the same thread here.
Rgds,
Faraday88

Hi Guys,
Here is another view of the 'True' Monopole RotorAttachment 5939
you may compare this with what is present in the JB website drawn by jb him self, it isdifferent only slightly..let me know where is the difference you see in these two..?
Rgds,
Faraday88

[Aaron Murakami]

I saw your help request about an attachment. I emailed you and it said the account is no longer valid. Please check your account settings that you have an updated email. For attachments, you should be able to open them all when logged in. What is the link to the message with an attachment that you can't open?

[Aaron Murakami]

Hi Aaron,
I would place that magnet closer to the rotor..or actually with the rotor...and with some other changes..acheive what you said without increasing the strength, because the scalar -south is increased anyway because of the transformation i did to it that way. Eureka!! this is like Tesla was born before Faraday
all in one man!!!...
Rgds,
Faraday88.

It's supposed to be placed as close as possible. I have it at a distance to draw the concept easier. It works indisputably and gives a much faster speed with much less input. I've done it a thousand times with various SG's that I've built over the years. It's of course easier and more practical with small diameter rotors - with a single magnet anyway. I put one on both sides of the rotor facing each other. Depending on the strength, it is not always desirable to put them on the rotor such as if using larger neons on the shaft but if using ceramic discs then of course they can be right on or by the rotor.

[Faraday88]

Ok, I'll give you the little trick I came up with years ago that strengthens the south superpole poking out between the magnets. You can draw it out and predict where the North face of the disc magnets want to go. This always works, does the strengthening without making the faces of the magnets stronger, which would be undesirable, but it makes it run faster, which will of course reduce the input draw.

If any of you try it, please post your results. For practicality of the ring magnet size, its easiest of course on smaller rotors. But the idea can obviously be applied with magnets strategically embedded into larger rotors to give the same effect.



You can see the idea in the sketch - more than an idea, it works because I've done it on multiple smaller SG's and it always speeds up the rotor with reduced current.

If you have north out on the magnets, superpole south squeezes out between the magnets as shown.

Drawing shows 1 ring magnet on shaft, but use 2 - one on each side of the rotor. When Yaro was experimenting with a magnet and the ZFM, it reminded me of this so here it is. This is obviously simpler than the ZFM arrangement with 2 different poles on the rotor but I believe it can be applied to that when tweaked according to the fields on the rotor.

Make sure the face of the disc magnet facing the rotor is the polarity of the superpole squeezing out between the magnets. So obviously when you try to move the disc magnets towards the rotor they'll want to repel. Push them there and glue them, whatever. The S faces on disc magnets will push on those superpole south fields and will density them so they will be stronger squeezing out between the norths.

First test I ever did was on the little pink roller skate wheel SG I have. I put the disk magnets on the shaft both sides like this. As they got closer to the rotor as the rotor was spinning, the repulsion was obvious so bit by bit, I forced them closer and closer and the wheel sped up and current dropped.

You can obviously put stronger magnets on the rotor to get a stronger superpole, but the point is to do this without increasing the actual strength of the magnets on the rotor.

Hi Aaron,
I would place that magnet closer to the rotor..or actually with the rotor...and with some other changes..acheive what you said without increasing the strength, because the scalar -south is increased anyway because of the transformation i did to it that way. Eureka!! this is like Tesla was born before Faraday
all in one man!!!...
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[Faraday88]

Haven't see those vids since they came out, but any dipole that polarizes the aether and has a conduction so that the positive potential turns into EMF can move to the lower potential and get dissipated to a degree on the way is happening in every circuit all the time.

The virtual poles always seemed very real to me - just stronger per area (more focused).

Later, I'll show something I came up with years ago to enhance the Q1, Q2 (scalar poles) to make the rotor turn even faster with less input. Actually part of an addendum to go with the SG trilogy - don't want to get into that right here at this point.

Isn't that structure intrinsic in any rotor for the SG if all like poles are facing out?

What voltage before being loaded? Input or output battery?

'The virtual poles always seemed very real to me - just stronger per area (more focused).'
Aaron...Yes the virtual Pole (S-pole in the case discuss here) may be more Electrical than Magnetic only transformed in the real space.
im on the way to club these and present them here if i succeed!!!
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[Faraday88]

Hi Aaron,
It is a delight to hear on the Bloch wall pump more since this is applicable even to the G-field Generator, accept that it (the bloch wall) gets éxtended' at the Gap (between the pole pieces of the stator magnets and the rotor coils) and the Polarity (NS) shows up in electrical circuit of the coils.
I think i can explain the bloch wall pump action of JB's two diagrams in short: it can be described in terms of the ''Inside'' and ''Outside'' of a Magnet's Field..[ATTACH=CONFIG]5937[/ATTACH]
Here i attached the structure of the Magnetic field as i see it and have recently constructed it and run tested to show the performance in how it charges the battery as compared to the normal Monopole structure commonly known. watch carefully how the Magnets are oriented and also the circular magnets making the Virtual S-pole become Real to add to the Induction Field.
I know I sound vauge right now, but will soon elaborate on what exactly I mean by the ''Inside'' and ''Outside''
any comments are welcome...
Rgds,
Faraday88.

Hi Aaron,
The mechanism of the Bloch wall pumping action was apparent to me in the Kromrey DVD, where JB shows the flexing width of the Bloch wall, and this has to do with the 3-flipps of the Magnets orientation (Gyroscopic flipps).
As I already mentioned in my previous post on how the Magnets interacts with the Coil say in the SG machine, I would elaborate it here now: The Actual Direction of the Magnets full interaction with the coil as per the N-Facing to the Coil is towrads it such that the Magnet passes through the coil.. but this cannot be done as the core would come on its path. There is another way if one wishes to maintain this method..and that is have the Core external such that you have a ferromagnetic toroid covering the coil. well, i shall explain that at a later point. comming back to the Magnet direction external to the coil..
To maintain the unidirection of the Magnet you needs to orient the magnet in the 3-axis of the Gyroscopic rotations, but again you cannot do the 3-axis in one coil at the same time..hence you need 3 coils spaced 120 degrees in relation to each other, to do each axis in each coil at the same time. This is the basis of the 3-pole-monopole. What you acheive is in essence is that you have brought the 'Inside' (Bloch wall) Out by making the 'Outside'(Dipolarity) a part of the 'Inside'.
The 3-flipp Gyroscopic rotation in essence flexes(pumps) the Bloch wall in the geometrical shape of the Magnet..for example in a typical ceramic magnet which is rectangular shape.. flexes the Bloch wall in three unequal different widths (exactly like what JB showed in the dvd), if one uses a cubical shaped Magnets then accordingly you would flex the Bloch wall in three equal alterations.
The charging of the secondary batteries is like no other with this configuration of the monopole machine and an amazing self start free flaoting of the rotor upon power application is synounmous

[Faraday88]

For example in the Kromrey machine, if the magnets are weak enough, you can pull and stretch the field out and away as if it is taffy - really flexible. On a neo, it's like plucking a string wound way too tight, you don't get much of that flexibility.

Hi Aaron,
I see another difference...the Electrical Conductivity of the Neo's is higher than those of the Ceramic..The Neo's in a Monopole are a advantage while in a Flux gate switching like in the G-field/kromrey the Ceramics are suitable since the gap between the magnet and the pole piece represent(Dynamic) the effective Bloch wall and the true static Bloch wall become dissipative if the magnets are Electrically cnductive like in the Neo's.
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[Faraday88]

I haven't seen a difference using those methods that I've tried in the past.

Hi Aaron,
You are right..its not difference that i'm talking about...its the two equivalent ways that do the same thing is what i meant...
Rgds,
Faraday88.