The 3d Monopole Coil How To Build

[Notsure]

I would like to give some food for thought, not trying to sell anything here. What if you reverse the general idea that light is a manifestation of the electric? That actually it's the other way around? That by saying energy can't be created or destroyed, your really saying light can't be created or destroyed? The power company uses magnetism to sell you electricity but your not paying for magnetism. They are selling you light and heat by way of resistance to magnetism. So I don't think you can create something that's already there, it's the resistance to it, long waves to short waves or whatever. I don't understand it either, just kind of a fuzzy logic point of view.

[John_Bedini]

my machine

This is what you do not know, please do not ask where it came from just except it, all as i can say is only a few know. but this goes way back in time. as I said there are two schools of thought.
John

[James_Somewhere_In_Idaho]

John

Thank you for posting the magnet illustration with further explanation, as well as the portion of the "mystery" magnetic power article. It is sort of like looking down the road during a foggy night, and as one drives along, the fog starts to clear, and one sees more and more...

BrentA929

If we needed to determine the natural frequency of the system, we could measure the inductance of the trigger winding, and then match the resulting amount in whatever division of "Henries" it indicated and calculate what type of capacitor, in whatever division of Farads, that one could use in series or parallel--depending on how you built the circuit--keeping in mind the frequency you wish it to run at (part of the calculation). This is best known as an LC or LCR [the L is inductance, C is capacitance, and R is resistance] circuit. However, John has not indicated that we should consider building it this way. Therefore, I (and many others) feel it is best to build things the way John says to build it, get it running the way he says it should run (as best as one can), and then experiment with things like "determining resonant frequency"--seeing whether that improves anything or not, or makes things less effective. I have (sort of) asked your questing in a couple different ways already, and from John's responses, I gather that there are more important aspects to consider first...that's my understanding, anyway. However, if you are already at the point where it's running good, and want to experiment, you could investigate LCR circuits, blocking oscillators, and such...at least you might gain some understanding on how to more easily bring a solid state unit into self-oscillation (as there is no wheel to trigger it). Hope that helps (from my limited knowledge).

[Brodie Gwilliam]

John have you ever tried the zero force motor with magnets at a full 90 degree orientation?

[John_Bedini]

[Tom C]

you can see hints of leedskalnin in those writings..

Tom C

[Notsure]

What I mostly found with these machines was the dynamics of impedance over resistance. The current leading or lagging the voltage, especially with caps. My preference has always been the trigger coil. I use resistance to get me in the ballpark then try to match that with just a fine wire coil using the bifilar method. Eliminating the resistor altogether. Much better results in my opinion, but it's harder to do. There are so many variables, sometimes I found that the resistor's resistance value didn't matter as much as it's wattage value did. That's over a wide range of values too. So my conclusion was that with the right impedance the resistance can be zero. I don't know how right I am on this, just observations and conclusions.

[James_Somewhere_In_Idaho]

Hi John, et al

Woah! The fog is starting to clear a bit more! Thank you for that, John.

So, with this (the last writing you posted, John), one should strive to bring, the current supplied to the base, down to the very minimum, and try to design the circuit to make the pulse happen before any/or much current flows through the transistor or switch, and the coil--just enough to allow the coil to "energize", but not enough to flow, and then when the switch (or transistor) turns off, the spike should be nearly pure "potential" going to the battery...therefore, we need to stop thinking in terms of amperage and wattage going to the battery (such as "I need 600 watts suppliying a charge for my 1000 Ahr Battery"--that would be wrong thinking here), rather how much "potential" goes there...am I correct in this assumption? Thank you.

[Michael Luton]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]4864[/ATTACH]

[Branch Gordon]

This seems to go against what others have advised in the past regarding "tuning". I haven't been able to push a big 150AH battery up past 15V without tuning my 3 coiler to 1 or two spikes.

I HAVE noticed however, that when I first spin up my machine, in the first 10 seconds when the RPM is still pretty low, I get some massive spikes. But then if I increase resistance after the machine spins up completely to get back down to that RPM, it's not enough potential to push the battery up.

I have continuously heard John refer to the SG as "currentless", and given that info I've never really understand why I can't seem to charge up big batteries without current.

Hi John, et al

Woah! The fog is starting to clear a bit more! Thank you for that, John.

So, with this (the last writing you posted, John), one should strive to bring, the current supplied to the base, down to the very minimum, and try to design the circuit to make the pulse happen before any/or much current flows through the transistor or switch, and the coil--just enough to allow the coil to "energize", but not enough to flow, and then when the switch (or transistor) turns off, the spike should be nearly pure "potential" going to the battery...therefore, we need to stop thinking in terms of amperage and wattage going to the battery (such as "I need 600 watts suppliying a charge for my 1000 Ahr Battery"--that would be wrong thinking here), rather how much "potential" goes there...am I correct in this assumption? Thank you.

[Dave Wing]

This is what you do not know, please do not ask where it came from just except it, all as i can say is only a few know. but this goes way back in time. as I said there are two schools of thought.
John

Hi John,

The book is something of a rarity as I cannot find it on the net... anywhere... Could you please post the title or better yet a PDF of the complete book if you have it on file?

Thanks,

Dave Wing

[James_Somewhere_In_Idaho]

Hi Dave

You might have missed this from when John posted the first part: "...please do not ask where it came from just except it, all as i can say is only a few know. but this goes way back in time. as I said there are two schools of thought..." Sorry, wish I could access it as well. I'm hoping he will post more, as I am getting a lot out of it.

[Tom C]

this is what the "q's" are

[Dave Wing]

Hi Dave

You might have missed this from when John posted the first part: "...please do not ask where it came from just except it, all as i can say is only a few know. but this goes way back in time. as I said there are two schools of thought..." Sorry, wish I could access it as well. I'm hoping he will post more, as I am getting a lot out of it.

Hi James,

I don't think I missed it. I interpret John's statement to mean... please do not ask for the authors credentials, as that is meaningless anyways as most classical electrical engineers are oblivious to this type of scientific literature and or work, having not been taught these particular lessons in school, so just accept it, as all I can say is... only a few know.

Dave Wing

[John_Bedini]