Big-Bang falacies and the Occult Aetheric Physics reality.

[Aaron Murakami]

Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

The Milky Way's halo is what Einstein referred to as curved spacetime.

Curved spacetime physically exists in nature as displaced aether.

Yes, but you point out the distinction about aether rebounding back to where it was displaced from which contradicts Einstein. That rebound allows for a reaction to take place and is accurate.

Einstein does not allow this, which is a blatant violation of one of the most obvious universal principles. His curved space is a mass simply curving space but the space gives no reaction to the mass "curving" it. Therefore, Einstein worshipers do not believe gravitational potential can contribute anything that does work. It just sits there static. It seems that his theories were very carefully crafted so that they intentionally do not violate conventional thermodynamics so everyone is still trapped in the mindset that everything is an isolated system blocked from environmental input.

Maybe Einstein really did know the truth and if he did, I believe he was never allowed to tell it because the establishment has to retain their "authority". There is a lot of evidence that shows he knew that Dayton Miller was right but was in a position to never officially admit it.

Since the Aether is the medium or propagation and motion, I think it is the Aether that defines space. So instead of Aether occupying space, the space with it's coordinate dimensions is there because of the Aether. Without Aether, it is a true void or true vacuum and there are no 3D coordinates possible and no propagation of light possible.

[Aaron Murakami]

Faraday,

What do you mean by this? "solve the shaffel based on the Magnetic Monopole concept and a full Regauge method"

Virtually every over 1.0 cop system is already asymmetrically re-gauging itself whether it is magnetic or not.

----------------------------------

Bearden says:

Regauging is Free Electrical or Magnetic "Refueling"

A-regauging a sector of a rotary electromagnetic engine is just like refueling a car by putting gas in its gas tank: During the regauging operation, the system is an "open" system receiving an injection of excess potential (stored) energy from the surrounding vacuum -- except in the electromagnetic case the refueling is free. (See Figure 3). The excess stored energy injected into the system from the "refueling" jump due to A-regauging, can then be dissipated in the load during the remainder of the rotary cycle -- just as a refueled automobile can dissipate its additional fuel energy in powering the car, until it is time for refueling again.
By using one or both of these two master principles (i) A-regauging the potential energy of the system, and (ii) use of a multivalued potential for A-regauging, electromagnetic engines can permissibly exhibit COP>1.0, without any violation of the laws of physics, thermodynamics, Maxwell's equations, or advanced electrodynamics. And a totally-permanent-magnet motor can power itself and its load.

----------------------------------

The speech by Professor Stig Claesson of the Royal Academy of Sciences of Sweden that introduced Prigogine when he received the Nobel Prize says:

Prigogine has called these systems dissipative systems, because they are formed and maintained by the dissipative processes which take place because of the exchange of energy between the system and its environment and because they disappear if that exchange ceases. They may be said to live in symbiosis with their environment.

-------------------------

With regauging, Bearden is focused primarily on electromagnetics because that is the context that regauging is usually used in. Regauging definition of Regauging in the Free Online Encyclopedia.

However, when we look at the universal principle, it is actually universal in all over 1.0 cop systems that are open with their environment.

Professor Claesson's comment here: "formed and maintained by the dissipative processes which take place because of the exchange of energy between the system and its environment" is exactly describing the principle of regauging - just not with electromagnetics, but any open dissipative system.

The entire key to regauging is: Through the process of dissipation, a new dipole is established that allows new environmental Potential Energy to enter the system to perform more work.

For example, a bouncing ball is asymmetrically regauging itself. Through the process of dissipating energy, it regauges itself at a certain efficiency and re-establishes a new dipole every time it bounces up. That allows this dissipate system to be - "maintained by the dissipative processes which take place because of the exchange of energy between the system and its environment."

The Veljko 2-stage mechanical oscillator is the same thing. Through it's own dissipation of energy (work), it is constantly establishing a new dipole where new gravitational Potential Energy enters to do more work over and over.

Obviously the dipole gets less and less on each cycle, but that is because the efficiency is under 100% but the COP is way over 1.0.

What that shows us is if a ball is lifted to a meter and it is 90% efficient in bouncing or regauging itself, when it bounces up to 90 cm, all we have to do is provide enough work to lift it 10cm on every cycle to continuously have 100cm worth of lifting work accomplished (W = Fd).

On a per cycle basis, that is 1/10 of the work in for 10/10 work done. That is a COP of 10.0 on each cycle or a 1000% net gain in work on a per cycle basis.

[gravitational_aether]

'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
NASA - Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image

"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

Non-baryonic dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both.

The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether.

The Milky Way's halo is what Einstein referred to as curved spacetime.

Curved spacetime physically exists in nature as displaced aether.

'Was the universe born spinning?'
Was the universe born spinning? - physicsworld.com

"The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis"

The Universe spins around a preferred axis because the Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet; a larger version of a black hole polar jet.

'Mysterious Cosmic 'Dark Flow' Tracked Deeper into Universe'
NASA - Mysterious Cosmic 'Dark Flow' Tracked Deeper into Universe

'The clusters appear to be moving along a line extending from our solar system toward Centaurus/Hydra, but the direction of this motion is less certain. Evidence indicates that the clusters are headed outward along this path, away from Earth, but the team cannot yet rule out the opposite flow. "We detect motion along this axis, but right now our data cannot state as strongly as we'd like whether the clusters are coming or going," Kashlinsky said.'

The clusters are headed along this path because the Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet.

The following is an image analogous of the Universal jet.

Smoot Cosmology Group

The reason for the 'expansion' of the universe is the continual emission of aether into the Universal jet. Three dimensional space associated with the Universe itself is not expanding. What we see in our telescopes is the matter associated with the Universe moving outward and away from the Universal jet emission point. In the image above, '1st Stars' is where aether condenses into matter.

Dark energy is aether emitted into the Universal jet.

It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing.

[Faraday88]

Hi Aaron ,
I just had an ephiphany while i was playing with my childeren's Ruby's cube, that could there be a easy way
to solve the shaffel based on the Magnetic Monopole concept and a full Regauge method...?
just my intution
rgds,
Faraday88.

[Faraday88]

Hi Woody,

go ahead will share with you some of my findings as well...

Rgd,
Faraday88.

[Faraday88]

Hi Aaron,

1 +1 =1 and 2 =1 Asymmetrical equivalent...?

My view,as an example is the John Bedini Tesla Switch shown in his page.

Rgds,
Faraday88.

[Aaron Murakami]

Hi Aaron,

I'm keen to read your 'Quantum Key'
and yes 1+1 =1 Geometrically as well.... your are so correct.
rgds,
Faraday88.

Just to clarify, philosophically, I do believe 1 + 1 = 1. Anytime you add things together, you still have 1 of whatever it winds up being.

In my example below however, I mean that in conventional science, they claim that you get out what you put in in terms of energy expended.

So if you lift an object and let it go, the total work you get is what you put in meaning, you put in 1 and you get out 1 but they say it is what you put in meaning, they are literally saying 1 + 1 = 1 when adding up all the work. 2 units of work were done and we only paid for 1 and they are completely trying to brainwash people into not seeing this.

When you lift an object and drop it - what you get out of what YOU put in was the lift of the object in and of itself. The formula W = Fd shows exactly how much entropy was there when you lifted the object. So what you got out of what you put in was only the lift. There is nothing stored when it is at the peak because you just used up everything needed to lfit the object. You simply created a new dipole or potential difference between the object and the ground. PE (Potential Energy) = MGH or mass x gravity x height predicts the amount of energy - not that is stored in the object at that height, but the amount of Potential Energy available from free gravitational input. When dropped, that much work will be had on impact, etc... also, entropy.

So when you put in 1 joule to lift an object, you already got out of it what you put in. The lift. Then you drop it and free gravitational input contributes its Potential Energy to do more work and if the object is like a clay ball and doesn't bounce, you get the same amount of work, measurable entropy when it drops and then comes to a dead stop or equilibrium with its environment in heat, friction, etc...

So, you expended 1 joule and got 1 joule of work. You let go of the object and received a free 1 joule of entropy for a total of 2 joules of mathematically calculable joules of work dissipated. 1 in and 2 dissipated or a COP of 2.0. That is the principle that happens 100% of the time with nature. So 1 in + 1 free out = 2 total.

Conventional science claims you put in 1 and you only get 1 out completely brainwashing people into believing that only 1 joule of entropy happened, when in fact there are 2 joules of entropy that happened.

They say 1 + 1 = 1. But the facts are that 1 joule in + 1 joule free = 2 joules of dissipated energy that are mathematically calculable that have contributed to the entropy of the universe.

For billions of people to believe that nonsense about you putting in 1 and only getting 1 back over the years is profoundly staggering and again - only shows that mass hypnosis works.

It there are indeed 2 joules of measurable entropy that happened, and there is in that example as a mathematical fact, the 2nd joule could not have come from us since we used up everything in the lift meaning that it came from external forces proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the static model of gravity is completely ludicrous and closed system thermodynamics dealing with isolated systems doesn't apply.

8th grade formulas and 2nd grade math is all that is needed for irrefutable mathematical proof that conventional thermodynamics is wrong, static gravitational models are wrong, etc...

Where does the extra input come from? Gravity, which is the aether rebounding back to where it was displaced from by the mass. In regards to the subject of this thread - it is the Aether rebounding back towards the mass imparting a push on it and that is what holds mass to the surface of the Earth. A dynamic flowing source potential.

[Woody]

Hey Woody...Greetings Pal!
long time no see...ahh..

Like minds Cohere...
rgds,
Faraday88.

Howdy Faraday! I'm still working on that variable capacitance thing. I'll figure out what your getting at one of these days.....

For an excellent article on the 1919 eclipse data that was taken by Arthur Eddington and which supposedly proved Einstein's general relativity theory, see "Infinite Energy" magazine volume 15 issue #87 of 2009. It is extensive, well written and very detailed. The author is Richard Moody Jr.

Here is the first part of the article on the magazine's website: The Eclipse Data of 1919, The Greatest Hoax in 20th Century Science by Richard Moody Jr.

For the entire article you can order the issue from the publisher, or perhaps your local library has a copy.

The truth will out!!

-Woody

[Aaron Murakami]

@ Aaron-

I am reading the Quantum key right now and I am enjoying it very much! Thanks you for writing it, and making it available.

Blessings to you,

-Woody

Thank you! I think you will be very happy with the next edition - free download when it is uploaded to the same download page.

[Faraday88]

Hi Aaron,

I'm keen to read your 'Quantum Key'
and yes 1+1 =1 Geometrically as well.... your are so correct.
rgds,
Faraday88.

[Faraday88]

Hey Woody...Greetings Pal!
long time no see...ahh..

Like minds Cohere...
rgds,
Faraday88.

[Woody]

@ Aaron-

I am reading the Quantum key right now and I am enjoying it very much! Thanks you for writing it, and making it available.

Blessings to you,

-Woody

[Woody]

The current mainstream western culture has successfully isolated people from the natural world. When you have never put a seed of any kind in the ground and watched it grow to not only replicate itself, but also produce a stalk with leaves and hundreds of identical seeds it is easy to swallow the mechanistic, materialistic, entropic deception that is modern science. As a Native American and Christian, I can see the flow of the spirit of the Creator throughout this creation. Science and spirituality must meet and speak together in order to have the complete picture. Eric Dollard says to take the time to go into nature and contemplate the things which we are all studying, because it helps to reveal things when we observe nature. John Cejka also made examples of things in nature that explain these concepts. When all people do these days is keep their noses in front of a screen of some kind, and never look at the sky, or the way water flows in the sink, or in a river, or how the water vapor behaves in the bathroom after a shower, well it tends to the kind of intellectual laziness that typifies the modern western cultures. What a shame. We are better than that. We are capable of so much more.

I do not have a T.V. even though I grew up with the infernal thing. I have never owned one since I left my parents house at age 18. I am turning 50 in a month and I never will have an idiot box. EVER. My advice to anyone hoping to reclaim their brain and shut off the propaganda is to do the same.

Get outside and be an observer of nature. It is the best free education you will ever find. The Native cultures have much to say on these subjects that interest us. The concept of the open system is a forgone conclusion to native cultures that are still in touch with the earth. It is obvious, and is a given. For too long the western mindset has been to disregard ancient wisdom. This is done to the detriment of all. Perhaps things are beginning to change now though. Let's hope so. Let's speak of these things to our children and grandchildren. Let's put the wonder of the Creator back into His creation. Back into science. Then kids will love it again because it will be alive again!! LIFE!!!

A little off topic perhaps, but a passion of mine.

Your brother,

-Woody

[Aaron Murakami]

Yep - every natural system is an open non-equilibrium system.

The argument the conventional follower uses is to continually expand the size of the system so that the device, etc... is inside of to claim it is isolated and the energy doesn't change.

If you show obvious over 1.0 COP in a natural system, they will say, "The system is actually the Earth so the energy stays the same." Then if you use a planetary size example, they will conveniently claim the system includes the whole solar system so the "energy stays the same". Then a solar system example, they will say the system is then the galaxy. And a galactic example - they claim the system is the universe. All in a feeble attempt to show how the system is "isolated" and the energy in that whole system didn't change.

In all fairness, these "Laws" were established before there was a clear distinction on open systems but that is not an excuse for people in the modern world to continue to believe in such delusions. Especially, when thermodynamics has been extended to include open systems since the 70's.

What conventional science proves is that mass hypnosis works and that billions of otherwise intelligent people over the decades are suffering from delusions. In the end, we see that the real crack pots all along are those in front of the classrooms.

Definition of DELUSION

1
: the act of deluding : the state of being deluded

2
a : something that is falsely or delusively believed or propagated
b : a persistent false psychotic belief regarding the self or persons or objects outside the self that is maintained despite indisputable evidence to the contrary; also : the abnormal state marked by such beliefs

[bluestix]

I added the very elementary math to prove that the first 3 Laws of Thermodynamics are wrong. It also shows how false Einstein's static gravitational model is as it is a blatant violation since mass curving space has no reaction - of course there is a reaction!

Isolated system - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Albert Einstein was a FRAUD - YouTube


Neo obediently walks down this path, but when confronted by The Architect, he learns that the Path is a lie, ''The One was never meant to end anything, it was all just another system of control.''