Aln's edited notes from Erfinder's discussions.

[min2oly]

Definitely easier to read, eh.

Hi all,

There is a thread over on OUR that might provide a somewhat decent understanding or at the very least, may provide a very solid base to start from.

Here is the link... There are quite a few tidbits, pictures and schematics posted in that thread and I recommend all read it.

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2248.0

-Dave Wing

[bigmotherwhale]

look at the comparison of bucking coils, now look at this:

http://www.esmhome.org/library/stan-meyer/fig3-23.gif

now remember this outputs to a 'water capacitor'

what exactly is meant by a switching diode? a mosfet?

also notice how there are two ++ magnetic polarity against a single -, bear this in mind when you read my previous post.

would you describe the layout as series parallel?

would you describe a rotor as a unipolar magnetic field coupling?

now ponder can it produce similar diametrically opposed waveforms... sine to square - square to sine

stan meyer found a better way to do this using a self inducing iron coil, this solved the problem of focus without having to convert between spacial dimensions, at least that's what i think he was doing, could be wrong of course.

BMW

[Dave Wing]

Yes Patrick as you said definitely easier to read...

Also look at the Gibbs phenomenon found here... http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbs_phenomenon read this page and look at the animation of the additive synthesis of a square wave with an increasing number of harmonics, where the sine wave goes very square and sharp. Screen shot of this demo below...

-Dave Wing

[Tom C]

there is only one problem with the natural series, that being, flux cancellation? or am i wrong?

if it happens at the right time, it could be the difference to where the cemf is Reapplied forward when the coils re energise ? from the info on OUR (thanks a bunch Dave) a replication is now theoretically possible an astable 555 circuit can drive that coil array with a Hall and IFRP460 . I think you would want to switch off in between coils where the north or south poles in bucking mode would lock the rotor otherwise, 6 magnets switching 3 times, anytime there was a north magnet over a pair of south coil poles. that is my sense of the rotor coil interaction based on his description.

Tom C

[Tom C]

Yes Patrick as you said definitely easier to read...

Also look at the Gibbs phenomenon found here... http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbs_phenomenon read this page and look at the animation of the additive synthesis of a square wave with an increasing number of harmonics, where the sine wave goes very square and sharp. Screen shot of this demo below...

-Dave Wing

the process he showed on one of his videos was exactly that a motor slowly oscillating into a square wave, great explaination of a known phenomenon

Tom C

[Tom C]

look at the comparison of bucking coils, now look at this:

http://www.esmhome.org/library/stan-meyer/fig3-23.gif

now remember this outputs to a 'water capacitor'

what exactly is meant by a switching diode? a mosfet?

also notice how there are two ++ magnetic polarity against a single -, bear this in mind when you read my previous post.

would you describe the layout as series parallel?

would you describe a rotor as a unipolar magnetic field coupling?

now ponder can it produce similar diametrically opposed waveforms... sine to square - square to sine

stan meyer found a better way to do this using a self inducing iron coil, this solved the problem of focus without having to convert between spacial dimensions, at least that's what i think he was doing, could be wrong of course.

BMW

switching diode... shottky?

Tom C

[bigmotherwhale]

a schottky diode is low voltage i dont think one would work here as the voltage climbs very quickly.

[Tom C]

when I see the words "switching" diode I think of a 1n914 or something like that....... as opposed to a power diode like a 1n5408. you want fast switching in an oscillating circuit that is what made me think of a schottky.

Tom C

[Tom C]

in the second schematic shown in the above picture when the fet is off it looks like an LC circuit is formed by the source/drain? diode in the FET. voltage would flow only to the cap since the P.S. would be disconnected. I do not think a reed or other switch would produce the same phenomenon as the coil circuit would be open.

Tom C

[bigmotherwhale]

i was wondering what would happen if you put a reed there too,
the diode is facing the wrong way, however if it can 'overcome any resistance' i dowt a diode would present much of a challenge
mosfets are known to have high internal capacitance if it is an oscillation this could be a means of charging the primary capacitor.
only experiments would verify this

[aln]

You guys are to the point, just what I was hoping for. Thanks for sharing relevant info. Here is some of the compiled notes in the Coil Connection

Coil connection: and another here
The waveform is exactly as I see it. When you build it you will see that rotation in one direction will have the peaks either going positive or negative, reversing the direction reverses this. There is much to be understood from the position of zero which is where you are when all coils are equal, and quite literally, you are making a zero using this connection, electrically and magnetically. Consider what the induced is doing in these coils, and what relation that has to the applied EMF at the time of switching. Why is it so difficult to see that the net result of inducing at these two locations is the reason why your consumption behaves as it does?
When you look at the image, prior to considering the output waveform, it is necessary to see what polarity is being induced in the coil and when. The image emphasizes the significance of inducing both on the approach, and receding, simultaneously. Presently, the books cover the two sequentially. I have found that inducing at both points has a powerful positive influence on the negative effects associated with Lenz's Law, the problem has been misinterpretation of the relationship between inducing and induced. In light of the above stated, the third coil introduces another set of three poles, and opens the door to generating chords. Fight the temptation for jumping ahead, it's not the way to go. Referring to your connections, you still haven't recognized the need for "proper coil to coil communication." The foundation is based on pairs

[bigmotherwhale]

so if you have two coils one long out of fine wire and one short out of thick wire, weighing the same, and you put the same energy through each of them to produce the same magnetic force (= 0 )but opposing what are you left with?
magnetic is no longer relevant, but what about the dielectric? is it an inductor? is it a capacitor?

[Tom C]

I thought coil magnetism is based on turns not weight. gauge of wire determines current capacity but turns determines gauss.... 5 turns of 18 will have less than 50 turns of 20

Tom C

[Dave Wing]

Hi all,

There is a thread over on OUR that might provide a somewhat decent understanding or at the very least, may provide a very solid base to start from.

Here is the link... There are quite a few tidbits, pictures and schematics posted in that thread and I recommend all read it.

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2248.0

-Dave Wing

Addition...

[bigmotherwhale]

http://www.leedskalnin.com/tesla_patent_464_666.pdf