With Reference to Tesla comments on Gravity

[Sam J Batchelar]

[Faraday88]

For all of the above..i can say that standard Physics books have no definition for Mass ,Time, & Energy and Teslian wisom does really sheds some light on it..
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[Aaron Murakami]

My presentation at the recent conference, Hacking the Aether, goes into all the mechanics at work on gravity, defining energy, showing the mechanism of inertia, what time actually is, etc... in a very simple way.

[Sam J Batchelar]

My presentation at the recent conference, Hacking the Aether, goes into all the mechanics at work on gravity, defining energy, showing the mechanism of inertia, what time actually is, etc... in a very simple way.

Is that presentation available currently (free or to purchase) anywhere?

For all of the above..i can say that standard Physics books have no definition for Mass ,Time, & Energy and Teslian wisom does really sheds some light on it..
Rgds,
Faraday88.

Yes, the physics of today seems to care more for the complications and implications of fundamental principles rather than the principles themselves being clearly understood, with reference to the variable "mass" I understand can be re-stated as volume (as in particle volume). Volume being linearly proportional to weight or pressure (of gravity).

I would like to emphasise the comparative difference in individual gain (understanding) as a product of individual effort to ascertain information about nature as opposed to relying on the efforts of others.

[Aaron Murakami]

Is that presentation available currently (free or to purchase) anywhere?




Yes, the physics of today seems to care more for the complications and implications of fundamental principles rather than the principles themselves being clearly understood, with reference to the variable "mass" I understand can be re-stated as volume (as in particle volume). Volume being linearly proportional to weight or pressure (of gravity).

I would like to emphasise the comparative difference in individual gain (understanding) as a product of individual effort to ascertain information about nature as opposed to relying on the efforts of others.

It's in queue to be released. All videos are going to be released according to the order the cameraman gets them into his computer for editing. All conference videos are paid downloads except for panel discussions and some special presentations.

[Faraday88]

Is that presentation available currently (free or to purchase) anywhere?




Yes, the physics of today seems to care more for the complications and implications of fundamental principles rather than the principles themselves being clearly understood, with reference to the variable "mass" I understand can be re-stated as volume (as in particle volume). Volume being linearly proportional to weight or pressure (of gravity).

I would like to emphasise the comparative difference in individual gain (understanding) as a product of individual effort to ascertain information about nature as opposed to relying on the efforts of others.

I fully agree with your views....Understanding is absolutely Individualistic...the masses cannot be educated...there is no mechanism to teach the masses... there is only self learning...the masses are compelled upon by situation to gather a learning in that way...that's how things are...
Rgds,
Faraday88.