Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The SG Radiant Oscillator

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • John_Bedini
    replied
    The Workings Of The SG Oscillator

    In this video I'm showing again after one hour the two batteries, the one battery was pretty much charged the other was dead, in the beginning video they start out close to being the same. Now as the one battery approaches full charge the current goes down and the other is building current. So one impedance is low and the other is high to the oscillator. As the battery approaches it's charge at 14.85 the other battery receives more charge but in the end they will both be balanced at 14.8 volts. This is all discussed on the Energy Science Forum at, http://www.energyscienceforum.com/ under The SG Oscillator This does apply to the motors too.

    Leave a comment:


  • John_Bedini
    replied
    SG Oscillators Two Nodes

    LessK,
    Sorry for doing that but I want to show some things about Radiant Current, I have not received the SG bike wheel yet so I thought I would give a starter, sorry.
    The SG circuits are all capable of dividing branch currents, after all we are just dealing with the spike which is Radiant. If everybody remembers my work from,
    Kron, Gabriel. "...the missing concept of "open-paths" (the dual of "closed-paths") was discovered, in which currents could be made to flow in branches that lie between any set of two nodes. (Previously — following Maxwell — engineers tied all of their open-paths to a single datum-point, the 'ground'). That discovery of open-paths established a second rectangular transformation matrix... which created 'lamellar' currents..." "A network with the simultaneous presence of both closed and open paths was the answer to the author's years-long search." Gabriel Kron, "The Frustrating Search for a Geometrical Model of Electrodynamic Networks," Journal unk., issue unk., circa 1962, p. 111-128. The quote is from p. 114.

    I'm just applying the Quote here in practice with the circuit, so you can see that if the coil was wound to take advantage of the currents what could be done.

    I'm posting another video, hopefully that will explain what I'm doing.

    Leave a comment:


  • LesK
    replied
    Just can't be....

    "In this video I'm showing what can be done with al the SG oscillators, ...."

    Ok, Everytime I think I am just getting a handle on something we go for another ride Those are not matched in almost any way. Why is the voltage the same?
    I was just getting the idea that the reason you added a chemical on top of the wafer in the original was to create a differential ..In the Transistor... I was thinking about the relationship to the six coil and the Ten coil with the copper tubing. I came to ponder the video again where you are showing the little stacked batteries and the height of trees. Then I remembered something about Tesla and voltage potential about 750,000 volts 450,000 joules per cubic centimeter. And then because all this is super high frequency ranges A little on Wave Guide theory came to mind. I had just begun to think about the new battery liquid you used and how the crystal structures bring energy into themselves like many streams from a mountain filling a pond with water, only energy in this case. This made sense as to why an oscilator was the ideal use for crystal cells it allows a moment for the pond to refill.
    Then as that was all coming together to make some sense to me I see two completley difient impedences with identical volatages..... I am thrown for a loop here John; you really got me on this one!

    As I see the original unit you had, I could see in my mind that the solar panel was just for switching power. I think the real energy from that system was what you did to the transistor to collect the high frequency differentials floating around it and pump those into the battery. We all think the SSG is running at the rotor speed but I think the transistor is doing something very different. But I also know one thing for sure and that's I don't know much......

    So why are those the same voltage?
    Les

    Leave a comment:


  • BrentA929
    replied
    John B,

    Is there a limit to how many batteries you can charge from one source?


    Thanks, Brent

    Leave a comment:


  • John_Bedini
    replied
    SG oscillators John Bedini

    In this video I'm showing what can be done with al the SG oscillators, what the Patent talked about was charging a battery by means from a Solar Panel/ or supply. However what the patent office disallowed was the use of branch currents. So one source is capable of charging multiple batteries from one source battery or the Solar Panel, this applies to all my machines if the impedance is figured out on the batteries. The discussion is in the Energy Science Forum at, http://www.energyscienceforum.com/ If you have two batteries, identical in all respects, and you charge them as a parallel pair, then each will get half of the current from the solar panel or oscillator. Each will get the full voltage. HOWEVER, as your batteries will never be identical, it is not a good idea to simply parallel them unless they are matched. The Radiant Chargeing acts a little different because it sees each batteries impedance as one circuit in this arrangement and so the batteries are split and on one oscillator circuit each.. US Patent 7,990,110
    John Bedini




    Leave a comment:


  • John_Bedini
    replied
    Geoffrey,
    Yes I understand what you also have gone through, But we must move on. What will happen is inventors will just make it very difficult to steal circuit and inventions. I for one will hy-bird everything. Congress has no touch with realty anymore as they never worked a real job, they just suck money, and that is just an example to the young people, you can steal what you want and it's ok. But hopefully we can all move on and build something for the future.

    Leave a comment:


  • geoffrey sr miller
    replied
    Originally posted by John_Bedini View Post
    Geoffrey,
    I just made error and dis not see it. 1n4008

    HI Mr. Bedini

    That is what i thought you meant with 1n4008.

    "Peter and I were doing the work on the oscillators, It had to do with solar charging in very low light. We wanted this unit on the back of the Solar Panels, so we needed 80% Eff or more to do this, just as was measured by Stan. You could parallel these units for power in low light. The unit we gave Stan was under trust to test for us, Stan was wrong as it was a COP>1 with the panels in low light or moon light. The Patent even says that. But you can see what happen here and why I put the information away until the Patent was issued. And you can see they never made it work the same, Stan destroyed the transistor and the compound on the chip and should have studied this a little more on solar panels.But this is the history of what happened. Here, This is the history of the SG Radiant Oscillator and how things get stolen even when you have people you trust to be helping you We were also studying the negative effects and had built a machine to measure transistors, we just did not guess at this we measured it. And built oscillators Rick and the rest of the gang never have seen. So you know the story of why now."

    AS for your above quote:

    I Know what it is like watching people take your ideas and use them in the marketplace.
    I hold over 12 patents on a new product that i wanted to get into Home Depot. see www.thepullout.com
    The product or, one version of it would hold a new type of generator in it, and you can hooked the generator to your house and go off of the electric grid.
    I had 3 companies try to take the idea and I had to get 3 cease and desist orders for my patents.


    I know little of what you may have gone through.

    Thank You for the information on the Diodes.

    Have a great day

    Geoffrey

    Leave a comment:


  • LesK
    replied
    Originally posted by John_Bedini View Post
    Peter and I were doing the work on the oscillators, It had to do with solar charging in very low light. We wanted this unit on the back of the Solar Panels, so we needed 80% Eff or more to do this, just as was measured by Stan. You could parallel these units for power in low light. The unit we gave Stan was under trust to test for us, Stan was wrong as it was a COP>1 with the panels in low light or moon light. The Patent even says that. But you can see what happen here and why I put the information away until the Patent was issued. And you can see they never made it work the same, Stan destroyed the transistor and the compound on the chip and should have studied this a little more on solar panels.But this is the history of what happened. Here, This is the history of the SG Radiant Oscillator and how things get stolen even when you have people you trust to be helping you We were also studying the negative effects and had built a machine to measure transistors, we just did not guess at this we measured it. And built oscillators Rick and the rest of the gang never have seen. So you know the story of why now.
    John,
    This was a very painful read. It has taken me a while to respond. And to add to those problems Orrin Hatch has gotten some new laws passed regarding patents that make all this even harder for the inventor.
    Some one can now steal the work even easier. Sterling talked about it on the scarecrow show. Your work has inspired a large quest in this field, and I have seen you acknowledge those who inspired, taught, and guided you; and we should all acknowledge and recognize you and your work as we grow in our research just as well. 90% of my understanding comes directly from you and some from Tom Bearden (I couldn't understand him until I learned from you and the SSG...Well, I can't really say I understand him...) along with bits and pieces from others. I have told many people over the last four years that given all the stuff out on the web that is both Dis-information and Mis-information there was no easy way to get to any truths. I took you as my guide and suggested to many others interested in this field to do the same. I have been buffeted for that more than a few times but I still stand by it. I may never really understand this technology enough to do much, because I simply do not have a broad enough education. For example chemistry was not one of my better studies, even now that in reading the article, I see that you had a coating on the transistor that they were not aware of. Even knowing you had done that, I still have no understanding as to why or how it would make a difference to the circuit. there are things in the coils that I think you understand so different it is hard to breach that gap and bring us into the light. And if you do, are you once again going to be taken advantage of? This is a tough situation, and a difficult line to walk. So after reading it completely I had a vision of Frodo the Ring bearer as he approached each hero and heroin, they were tested with the ring and had to overcome the temptation and walk away. I really don't understand what motivates you to help and teach and put all this out there. I have watched over the last few years on the forums and seen how much work and the many experiments you have done, and still took great pains and time to answer questions and post information to help even into the late hours of the night. I have wondered if all those machines in your shop have energized you to such a degree that you just don't have to sleep anymore. I don't know, but It sure seems like a lot of effort and work with very little return, and certainly the risk of being taken advantage of. I can only hope my interactions on the forums has been helpful. And once again say Thanks.

    Les

    Leave a comment:


  • John_Bedini
    replied
    Patrick,
    Yea but that's life, so lets just built it and see what it does when tuned you have the circuit in the post. More where that came from.
    John




    Originally posted by min2oly View Post
    John,
    This just bites the big one. I'm so sorry this happened. There are good people out here and many are here in these groups. Thank you so much for your continued work even after events such as this and others you have been through.
    Sincerely,
    Patrick Apodaca

    Leave a comment:


  • John_Bedini
    replied
    Kevin,
    I have answered you in the PM


    Originally posted by kevin View Post
    John please check ur PM

    Leave a comment:


  • kevin
    replied
    John please check ur PM

    Leave a comment:


  • min2oly
    replied
    Originally posted by John_Bedini View Post
    Peter and I were doing the work on the oscillators, It had to do with solar charging in very low light. We wanted this unit on the back of the Solar Panels, so we needed 80% Eff or more to do this, just as was measured by Stan. You could parallel these units for power in low light. The unit we gave Stan was under trust to test for us, Stan was wrong as it was a COP>1 with the panels in low light or moon light. The Patent even says that. But you can see what happen here and why I put the information away until the Patent was issued. And you can see they never made it work the same, Stan destroyed the transistor and the compound on the chip and should have studied this a little more on solar panels.But this is the history of what happened. Here, This is the history of the SG Radiant Oscillator and how things get stolen even when you have people you trust to be helping you We were also studying the negative effects and had built a machine to measure transistors, we just did not guess at this we measured it. And built oscillators Rick and the rest of the gang never have seen. So you know the story of why now.

    John,
    This just bites the big one. I'm so sorry this happened. There are good people out here and many are here in these groups. Thank you so much for your continued work even after events such as this and others you have been through.
    Sincerely,
    Patrick Apodaca

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeffrey Joseph
    replied
    Thanks for the truth. It didn't feel right

    Leave a comment:


  • John_Bedini
    replied
    Redcar1957, You got it.
    This was done without me knowing one thing.


    Originally posted by kevin View Post
    Soooo John this is redcar1957 from the energetic forum where we had chatted and talked on the phone about some trannys that were discontinued
    are we talking about our Rick from Michigan? please clarify
    Thank You for being the god send that you are

    Leave a comment:


  • John_Bedini
    replied
    Geoffrey,
    I just made error and dis not see it. 1n4008
    Originally posted by geoffrey sr miller View Post
    HI Mr. Bedini

    Thank You for looking at the circuit that i posted.

    In above past post:

    Do you mean a 1N4008 Diode or 1N1008 Diode which is a 380V 400mA Germanium Rectifier Diode made by GE and I believe is obsolete?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]548[/ATTACH]


    On a side Note:

    Here is a 2,000 lbs. sg wheel i made to run a 10,000 what gen. for my lab in the 1980's

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]550[/ATTACH]




    Have fun!

    Geoffrey

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X