The SG Radiant Oscillator

[LesK]

This is a very interesting device. Simple easy to build and a lot of fun to learn from.
I tried adding iron in the core and the frequency reduced slightly and that was about it. I then took two C8 magnets and stuck in the core and the frequency went down only slightly but it added about 200ma on the input.
Sure wish I had a copper or alumunum toroid the same size as the winding. Would love to see what would happen with that...

Still odd to me to be using so much current per strand though. little puzzled about that. looks like about 980ma going in.

Les

[John_Bedini]

T1000,
That is correct it is a double sided ax. I have done that in some of the units, Peter and I have a circuit that just did that of witch you speak, the results were mixed. Although I will do it again. I have see some different things when doing that, I'm not saying they are good or bad, just mixed. In 2000 Peter and I did almost the same circuit your showing in the post ,and I agree with what your saying. I must start somewhere here so I chose simple first. Please post a youtube showing your circuit working as I do not follow overunity.com. I'm sure everybody would love to see that.

[totoalas]

From a solar forum,
I ve read that for a wind generator ( fan converted ) to have a matching impedance with the battery, 2 transformers were added for two coils which were rectified and combined together for a single output to battery....
As T 1000 suggest two input combination like for example Solar suppled SS SSG out put is one and the other one positve / negative from solar panel to another input so either a 15 0 15 / 110 0 110 0 transformer to charge the battery please correct me if im wrong


Or impedance transformer used in audio speakers /// hope T 1000 can elaborate further

totoalas

[T-1000]

Hello everyone

I tried to introduce myself but forum did sent my post with urls into /dev/null..

Ok, I will try in short:
I started with John's SSG two years ago as first radiant spikes circuit then gone over long way in free energy research and experiments including making electricity from NMR effect.

It is always pleasure to see John's persistant progress on FE field.
The entire principles of free energy devices always have crossroads with what John is explaining just there is another half of Nature's duality not pursued by John. What I did found you always need to provide 2 separate inputs in transformer with two primaries: one is radiant voltage spikes on resonant frequency and the second is driving reactive currrent. When they mix up there are unexpected good results in output...

Cheers!

[T-1000]

In this Video I'm showing a Radiant SG Oscillator discussion is located here .http://www.energyscienceforum.com/ The oscillator was developed by me inside a MJ15024 Transistor. The Oscillator is discussed in Patent # US 7,990,110. The original oscillator was developed for solar charging in very low light.

Hi John,

I was following your research over last two years and it is always good to see your efforts on free energy research field.

My first radiant spike circuit was your SSG.. Over that time there was long road forward and I did lots of things including energy from NMR - Ferrite magnetic polarization (work in progress) - YouTube

Your circuits are always on crossing ways with all other and the missing puzzle for holy grail part seems is second signal in all free energy devices.
Here is my comment on your The Workings Of The SG Oscillator - YouTube - the radiant voltage spike is one of two components for full circuit and the second input signal should be reactive current taken from LC circuit in series(in 180 degrees to phase of voltage spike)... When you mix those two and put to charge battery after rectifying those mixed signals you may be very suprised...
The principal circuit I have in mind is there: Simple to build isolation transformer that consumes less power than it gives out

Hopefully it will ring some bells With your persistance and knowledge on this topic that part can be easily tested on real experiment.

Cheers!

[LesK]

OK, Here is my replication. It sure puts on a high surface charge 11.43 volts to 12.45 in a matter of minutes on the little motorcycle Batt but it has not been conditioned to this kind of charging. the Tractor batt (very well conditioned) was pretty well charged already but I wanted to see how it would do.
Using 680ohm on the base 18k from collector to base and 10k from base to emitter...

BediniOscilator - YouTube

Les

[min2oly]

Thanks John B.

We're doing some runs right now.
single coil 9filer 18awg two branches of 4 MJL's
1 primary 2 charging
just started this AM
This is a Solid State build we have been using for the last couple of months slightly over 1:1
Will see if the impedance's match on the end... will have to revisit this.
kind regards,
Patrick A.

[ReggieGM3]

...The Patent even says that. But you can see what happen here and why I put the information away until the Patent was issued...

John,
I don't want to distract from the intent of this thread. However, now that the patent is issued, can you comment on any future commercial availability of the oscillator?
Thanks, Ron

[BrentA929]

Impedance

John B,

Thank you for all that you have been sharing!

You have said for many years that it is an impedance matching thing. And have said on numerous occasions that the normal batteries impedance is around .0023 Ohms. However, if my calculations are correct, 40 ft. of #21 is about .51077 Ohms for just one wire. Is this what the batteries are seeing? Can you elaborate any on the best way for us to match coils to the impedance of the batteries.


On a side note:

One of the members (Bryan S) in the Yahoo group had posted something years ago that I think about often. He wrote, "John B looked me in the face at the conference last March when I was sitting by him. He practically stuck his finger in my face and said I've taken you as far as I'm allowed, the rest is up to you, it might be as simple as moving just one wire."

Could the reference to moving one wire be what you are showing here with the nodes? This is such good stuff!


Many thanks, Brent

BrentA,

No but you must build the coil for the correct impedance, like it might be advisable to make the transformer have a separate circuits/Coils all together (one trigger) instead of splitting it. It's all possible Brent, it just needs time and research on the groups part. One can look at it this way, everything has been done under the Sun, these inventions have been here before. We just rediscover things, and yes I have done this before in some experiments with Tom Bearden, It's in the TUV demo, Tom Explains it. Aaron said he may post it here. I want the group to experiment with it, it's the only way to learn.That coil is 40 feet long #21 wire coiled up just like you see it. Go back to the impulse technology you will understand it better.

[LutherG]

Hello John,

You mentioned a compound on the chip of the transistor. Is this something you can discuss further - like what benefit the compound provides and maybe some examples that could be useful?

Thanks very much for sharing this with us!

Luther

[John_Bedini]

The SG Radiant Oscillator

BrentA,

No but you must build the coil for the correct impedance, like it might be advisable to make the transformer have a separate circuits/Coils all together (one trigger) instead of splitting it. It's all possible Brent, it just needs time and research on the groups part. One can look at it this way, everything has been done under the Sun, these inventions have been here before. We just rediscover things, and yes I have done this before in some experiments with Tom Bearden, It's in the TUV demo, Tom Explains it. Aaron said he may post it here. I want the group to experiment with it, it's the only way to learn.That coil is 40 feet long #21 wire coiled up just like you see it. Go back to the impulse technology you will understand it better.

John B,

Is there a limit to how many batteries you can charge from one source?


Thanks, Brent

[John_Bedini]

LesK,
I'm using MJ15024's in this demo, The orignal oscillators used that transistor, I could have made this much better, but I think you get the point.

This is wonderful of you to bring back the basics. I have read this many times Yahoo! Groups and now that I finally see it on the scope It is really helping me to see what you have been trying to say.
Let's see this post was in 2004 and you had been talking about this long before that....Ok, We are slow learners.... Thanks for the patience John.
I can now think about this in a different way. I now see the node Peter talked about at the 2011 conference when the battery says I am done. Very nice!
When you say the coil has to be rewound then I am going to guess this means making better access at the 90 degrees. is it this componenet that will take us to the greater COP?
I still see the action in the PN juntion of the transistor but if I get this right your talking about the coil here, and it's effects on the lameller's?
Thanks also for clearing up the voltages.

I think it would be a good idea to replicate this. I am guessing in the example you are using 2n3055's? Anything else we should know?

Thanks John
Les

[LesK]

This is wonderful of you to bring back the basics. I have read this many times Yahoo! Groups and now that I finally see it on the scope It is really helping me to see what you have been trying to say.
Let's see this post was in 2004 and you had been talking about this long before that....Ok, We are slow learners.... Thanks for the patience John.
I can now think about this in a different way. I now see the node Peter talked about at the 2011 conference when the battery says I am done. Very nice!
When you say the coil has to be rewound then I am going to guess this means making better access at the 90 degrees. is it this componenet that will take us to the greater COP?
I still see the action in the PN juntion of the transistor but if I get this right your talking about the coil here, and it's effects on the lameller's?
Thanks also for clearing up the voltages.

I think it would be a good idea to replicate this. I am guessing in the example you are using 2n3055's? Anything else we should know?

Thanks John
Les

LessK,
Sorry for doing that but I want to show some things about Radiant Current, I have not received the SG bike wheel yet so I thought I would give a starter, sorry.
The SG circuits are all capable of dividing branch currents, after all we are just dealing with the spike which is Radiant. If everybody remembers my work from,
Kron, Gabriel. "...the missing concept of "open-paths" (the dual of "closed-paths") was discovered, in which currents could be made to flow in branches that lie between any set of two nodes. (Previously — following Maxwell — engineers tied all of their open-paths to a single datum-point, the 'ground'). That discovery of open-paths established a second rectangular transformation matrix... which created 'lamellar' currents..." "A network with the simultaneous presence of both closed and open paths was the answer to the author's years-long search." Gabriel Kron, "The Frustrating Search for a Geometrical Model of Electrodynamic Networks," Journal unk., issue unk., circa 1962, p. 111-128. The quote is from p. 114.

I'm just applying the Quote here in practice with the circuit, so you can see that if the coil was wound to take advantage of the currents what could be done.

I'm posting another video, hopefully that will explain what I'm doing.

[John_Bedini]

The SG Radiant Oscillator

John K,
You could take for example all those batteries you were given. You could see each battery charge the one's that are good would receive the charge and the one's that are bad will not do anything, they would just sit with high voltage on them. We have talked about this, the little video shows what I did and what you could do.

[John_Koorn]

Hey John B, thanks for sharing. Suppose I had a 10 coiler with 4 transistors and diodes per coil, 40 in total. I understand that I could charge 40 batteries to 1 input. That's great! But I don't have 40 batteries

I would imagine that if I matched the components per coil (say I had a 4 transistor board), I could charge 10 larger batteries - 1 for each coil. Right?

John K.