Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The SG Radiant Oscillator

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Faraday88
    replied
    Originally posted by min2oly View Post
    you triggered NO curiosity, only the need to correct your attempt to change history. The second green wire is soldered on together. It is plain as day in the video, it does not do as you describe. The 200 uH is in the patent.

    Have you played around with changing the resistance/inductance/impedance of the trigger wire much? If you have, then you will know why he connected the second wire, no mystery there.
    Hey,
    In your privious post also you mention just about 200uH but have not elaborate it any further that is just as bright as a daylight!!
    having the extra wire connected the way you describe will reduce the impedance of the trigger coil..yes that's correct! but that JB could do it using a thicker wire instead
    anyway i take your input and give it a try to see it experimentally..!
    still await your opinion on the 200uH significance..
    Rgs,
    Faraday88.

    Leave a comment:


  • min2oly
    replied
    Originally posted by Faraday88 View Post
    Hey,
    Its a compliment i consider that i can go back in time and strike a conversation and that did make a impact like your curiosity!!!
    Anway...the video i have watched to ascertain this about the third green wire.. im sure the end close to the branch resistors is left free and that it is appears to be twisted to the end that is connected to the Trigger/branch resistors...and it hints that in the forced trigger mode that it be this way..had it been the Free running mode (bottom end of trigger connected to the primary ground.) mode this implies the recovery coil as per pat# 6,545,444
    the component 36 is no different from the recovery coil except that it is wound around an axis other than the primary coil axis) does 200u H hint you what could that be..??
    ans for all i can tell you there are things not disclosed in the input power conditioning in this patent... a SSG cannot charge a battery of 12v from a 0.7v level..but this patent does it....think on that...
    Rgds,
    Faraday88.
    you triggered NO curiosity, only the need to correct your attempt to change history. The second green wire is soldered on together. It is plain as day in the video, it does not do as you describe. The 200 uH is in the patent.

    Have you played around with changing the resistance/inductance/impedance of the trigger wire much? If you have, then you will know why he connected the second wire, no mystery there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Faraday88
    replied
    Originally posted by min2oly View Post
    I find it interesting how you try to have a conversation with someone back in time. your attempt to pick up on/re-start an opinion on a subject that was 5 years ago is very curious.

    Anyway, you are wrong. Both green wires on one end tie to the power and on the other they BOTH tie to the branch resistors. Go rewatch the vid. The reason for this I state clearly should anyone care to go back and read my posts shortly thereafter. The patent does address, suggest 200 μH however.
    Hey,
    Its a compliment i consider that i can go back in time and strike a conversation and that did make a impact like your curiosity!!!
    Anway...the video i have watched to ascertain this about the third green wire.. im sure the end close to the branch resistors is left free and that it is appears to be twisted to the end that is connected to the Trigger/branch resistors...and it hints that in the forced trigger mode that it be this way..had it been the Free running mode (bottom end of trigger connected to the primary ground.) mode this implies the recovery coil as per pat# 6,545,444
    the component 36 is no different from the recovery coil except that it is wound around an axis other than the primary coil axis) does 200u H hint you what could that be..??
    ans for all i can tell you there are things not disclosed in the input power conditioning in this patent... a SSG cannot charge a battery of 12v from a 0.7v level..but this patent does it....think on that...
    Rgds,
    Faraday88.
    Last edited by Faraday88; 12-05-2017, 10:49 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • min2oly
    replied
    I find it interesting how you try to have a conversation with someone back in time. your attempt to pick up on/re-start an opinion on a subject that was 5 years ago is very curious.

    Anyway, you are wrong. Both green wires on one end tie to the power and on the other they BOTH tie to the branch resistors. Go rewatch the vid. The reason for this I state clearly should anyone care to go back and read my posts shortly thereafter. The patent does address, suggest 200 μH however.

    Originally posted by Faraday88 View Post
    Hey Howard,
    You are absolutely correct...SG is always a trifilar coil the other green wire is meant to be there with its top also connected to the Positive of the inout battery with the other end left free.... BTW its the component 36 that is a part of the trigger coil as explained in the Patent''Circuits and related methods of Charging a Battery''.
    Rgds,
    Faraday88.

    Leave a comment:


  • Faraday88
    replied
    Originally posted by Howard Wetsman View Post
    John K,
    So if we have one trigger attaching to both resistors what is the other green wire for? I can't see clearly that it isn't both wires attached to both resistors, maybe just bad resolution or old eyes.
    h
    Hey Howard,
    You are absolutely correct...SG is always a trifilar coil the other green wire is meant to be there with its top also connected to the Positive of the inout battery with the other end left free.... BTW its the component 36 that is a part of the trigger coil as explained in the Patent''Circuits and related methods of Charging a Battery''.
    Rgds,
    Faraday88.

    Leave a comment:


  • Faraday88
    replied
    Originally posted by pjreed01! View Post
    has anyone tried active rectification "op-amp" as diodes for earth batteries or any of the bedini devices?
    Hi Pjreed,
    Curious to know what that does.....?????
    Rgds,
    Faraday88.

    Leave a comment:


  • pjreed01!
    replied
    has anyone tried active rectification "op-amp" as diodes for earth batteries or any of the bedini devices?

    Leave a comment:


  • pjreed01!
    replied
    picture i sent up just last post is now old the new twisted coil i bought from teslagenx.com is awesome slightly larger spike and i changed the diodes to 2x sb5100 each transistor to allow up to 200v battery banks and it also gives a better spike recovery compared to the crap in5408's so good im ordering heaps of the sb5100's now.

    with lasersaber's ultra cap graphene type can they be charged up using the solidstate charger or do they need to have the linear regulator amp on the back to pure dc filter instead of spike charge? can the ultra caps by used on the tesla switch, and has anyone used 5x tesla switches, one in the middle and the output from the 4x others used as inputs for the middle tesla switch to then run a load? and/or have ultra caps on the outputs of the 4x before going the middle 5th one, sadly my tesla switch runs down and i have to move the batteries around all the time to make it to keep running it seem stronger one side vs the other side when it switches?

    Leave a comment:


  • pjreed01!
    replied
    my 6x transistor radiant oscillator, ive built 4x for my shed battery backup system to run off solarClick image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6495.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	888.7 KB
ID:	48838

    Leave a comment:


  • hobbyrobotik
    replied
    Hi Alvaro,
    driving the coil into saturation is not efficient. The loss is much more than the original triggercoil version. I suggest to study the basics about DC/DC-boost converters - you will find a lot of answers to your questions.
    have fun !
    hobbyrobotik

    Leave a comment:


  • Faraday88
    replied
    Originally posted by AlvaroHN View Post
    Hi to all, I am running a small 555 triggered solid state SSG,

    I have a couple of questions to anyone that can answer them.

    I am running it with a 555 so I can be able to swap batteries since I have no cap dump for this (low voltage), primary is 3,2v lifepo 700mA and secondary is another 3,2v lifepo4 700mA. The other reason that I am running it with a 555 is because I suspect that there is a loss in the trigger winding isn’t? that is why everyone say that the SSG is a learning tool?

    so this are my doubts: with the 555 circuit I can adjust the ON TIME and the OFF time, with the scope I can clearly see how the coil saturates, when the transistor close the switch the scope goes to 0 but at some point it seems to reach saturation and goes up, so obviously I have to set the ON TIME just to let the coil saturate of maybe cut it off before, since I just want the radiant which happens before the current, so why would I want to saturate the coil isn't?

    the other doubt is about the off time, I can set the off time to last just enough for the coil to discharge, or I can give it a little more off time, the thing is that after the coil discharges there is a ringing happening in the coil, so if my OFF TIME is longer than the ON TIME I can see the ringing, if my OFF TIME is the same duration as the ON TIME there is no ringing.

    I have seen that in normal SS SSG with trigger wire the duty is 50% aprox so there is no ringing in the scope.

    What is the way to go? is beneficial to have this ringing? or it doesn't matter? and what about the ON TIME? do I let the coil saturate? or I open the switch before the coil saturates?

    By the way just a comment, I tried the 1 wire thing, with 2 diodes at the end, and it does work! This energy does go through just 1 wire! Amazing!

    thank you, best,

    Alvaro
    Hi Alvaro,

    Before you play around with the Duty Cycle (ON TIME / OFF TIME) with the Rotary Machine, just put some thinking on how it does the triggering and what has duty cycle to do in this way of Switching.. having 555 timer does not help..
    Rgds,
    Faraday88.

    Leave a comment:


  • John_Koorn
    replied
    Hi pj and welcome.

    That's a lot of questions! I've never attempted to charge a bank higher than 24v, but theoretically it's possible.

    As for your "mod", I always run a large capacitor in between the solar panels and the SG circuit. The voltage rating of the capacitor should be around double the load voltage of the solar panel output and at least 10,000 microfarad.

    For example, I'm running a "24v" 200W solar panel and using a 100V 10,000 microfarad capacitor.

    Hope this helps...

    John K.

    Leave a comment:


  • pjreed01!
    replied
    hello
    I have a 415V dc input UPS 63Amp output (Eaton) for the house and 4x 96v battery banks charging from solar and 3x 8 transistor 24v radiant oscillators because the 9x solar panels are ex-insurance claim panels and where 24v, the radiant oscillators dont like the open circuit solar panel voltage, i was wondering if there is a circuit mod i can do so i can either charge the whole 415v dc bank up with the oscillators or as i have it now in 4 separated banks of 96v to at least charge as 4x i dont want to have 32x circuits off the wall to change it all from 12 - 24v to 415v, and i curious can a fisher and paykel motor be ran as a radiant oscillator because i have a few of them as well, i rewired it as 7 phase mixed 24v and ran it run to 1500rpm with a 110v motor from the solar which gave 415v but it didnt quite like the whole 415v bank because its current and the whole bank is always been charge with radiant, the ex- claimed gel cells are slowly getting changed over to t-105 trojan batteries which ive tested and gotten more out of them then the specs sheet and they are 4x better then the gels i current have more of. it takes about a fortnight to charge 1x bank with my current level of devices so a long time between blackouts luckily but id like to be ready to longer blackouts

    Leave a comment:


  • Dutuc Nicolae
    replied
    green power monitor, live data: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnMj6LSP6kk

    Leave a comment:


  • AlvaroHN
    replied
    Hi to all, I am running a small 555 triggered solid state SSG,

    I have a couple of questions to anyone that can answer them.

    I am running it with a 555 so I can be able to swap batteries since I have no cap dump for this (low voltage), primary is 3,2v lifepo 700mA and secondary is another 3,2v lifepo4 700mA. The other reason that I am running it with a 555 is because I suspect that there is a loss in the trigger winding isn’t? that is why everyone say that the SSG is a learning tool?

    so this are my doubts: with the 555 circuit I can adjust the ON TIME and the OFF time, with the scope I can clearly see how the coil saturates, when the transistor close the switch the scope goes to 0 but at some point it seems to reach saturation and goes up, so obviously I have to set the ON TIME just to let the coil saturate of maybe cut it off before, since I just want the radiant which happens before the current, so why would I want to saturate the coil isn't?

    the other doubt is about the off time, I can set the off time to last just enough for the coil to discharge, or I can give it a little more off time, the thing is that after the coil discharges there is a ringing happening in the coil, so if my OFF TIME is longer than the ON TIME I can see the ringing, if my OFF TIME is the same duration as the ON TIME there is no ringing.

    I have seen that in normal SS SSG with trigger wire the duty is 50% aprox so there is no ringing in the scope.

    What is the way to go? is beneficial to have this ringing? or it doesn't matter? and what about the ON TIME? do I let the coil saturate? or I open the switch before the coil saturates?

    By the way just a comment, I tried the 1 wire thing, with 2 diodes at the end, and it does work! This energy does go through just 1 wire! Amazing!

    thank you, best,

    Alvaro

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X