Farady,
with the monopole stick with the mjl- it goes negative. fets dont switch the way you want. been down that road. you can use the igbt in other hi current switching circuits, I have never used them too expensive to blow up.
with a cap pulser you can use an SCR or a fet switched on the negative, as it is the cap dump that goes negative in the battery, "ring the bell twice" it was said on someones door. the lead acid battery in the monopole circuit cannot be stressed enough, its half of the "magic" not sure yet about alums.
the difference in pulsed DC is you use the potential not the current. you switch after the ions move and before the elctrons move, thereofore creating a time based unidirectional time wave that stresses the aether, and pulse the dipole into the circuit. the info is contained in the spike. you need a little bit of current to get the front end working in classic EE parlance, but the back end is all radiantly powered when done right.
looking forward to your work!
Tom C
with the monopole stick with the mjl- it goes negative. fets dont switch the way you want. been down that road. you can use the igbt in other hi current switching circuits, I have never used them too expensive to blow up.
with a cap pulser you can use an SCR or a fet switched on the negative, as it is the cap dump that goes negative in the battery, "ring the bell twice" it was said on someones door. the lead acid battery in the monopole circuit cannot be stressed enough, its half of the "magic" not sure yet about alums.
the difference in pulsed DC is you use the potential not the current. you switch after the ions move and before the elctrons move, thereofore creating a time based unidirectional time wave that stresses the aether, and pulse the dipole into the circuit. the info is contained in the spike. you need a little bit of current to get the front end working in classic EE parlance, but the back end is all radiantly powered when done right.
looking forward to your work!
Tom C
Comment