Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX


2019 ESTC ALL SEATS SOLD OUT!
PRE-REGISTER FOR THE
2020 ENERGY CONFERENCE

Monero XMR

Page 119 of 121 FirstFirst ... 1969109117118119120121 LastLast
Results 1,181 to 1,190 of 1203

Thread: Plasma Ignition | Plasma Jet Ignition

  1. #1181
    Quote Originally Posted by heysoundude View Post
    Plasma theoretically allows for a more complete oxidization of the air-fuel charge in the combustion chamber. the benefits would be allowing someone to fine tune fuel consumption, and the side effect/result would be lowered emissions/costs of operation/equipment longevity
    Still too complicated for me. Pls give me data on what you achieved with YOUR car. My vehicle is a toyota 2002 revo gasoline. What will be the benefits if i start diy'ing 'plasma ignition' on it?

  2. #1182
    firozmusthafa, the good thing about what you are doing is you enjoy your work, that's a good thing. As for me, I am basically an electronics enthusiast. Difficult to grasp auto-mechanics. Like having two left foot, if you know what i mean. Wrong hole!

  3. #1183
    Hi Nuvisys,

    Quote Originally Posted by nuvisys View Post
    firozmusthafa, the good thing about what you are doing is you enjoy your work, that's a good thing. As for me, I am basically an electronics enthusiast. Difficult to grasp auto-mechanics. Like having two left foot, if you know what i mean. Wrong hole!
    How does this equate with the following quotes?

    heysoundude, de-carboning engines/exhaust systems seems like a good observation, however, imo, the reason the emission is greatly reduced is, negative air molecules and positive fuel molecules are drawn in the mixing chamber, which are mixed to the highest level resulting in almost total combustion. Disabling the devices will result in heavy smoke after a few seconds.

    There had been several theories on how the device's greatly affect emissions. (three or four theories up-to-date)
    Plasma theoretically allows for a more complete oxidization of the air-fuel charge in the combustion chamber. the benefits would be allowing someone to fine tune fuel consumption, and the side effect/result would be lowered emissions/costs of operation/equipment longevity
    from what I recall, nuvisys' technology mixes air and fuel more evenly/completely prior to combustion. this causes automated fuel delivery systems to theoretically trim back to a predetermined "stoichiometric" ratio. a strong and more precisely timed ignition event (such as from plasma) allows for most efficient operation of an engine. I think it's a good investment, if you're the type of person who buys a vehicle and uses it over the long term, to add these types of enhancements, as the costs are likely quickly offset by fuel savings, and your emissions are likely well below standards, possibly even below measurable limits.
    So I'm to believe that you invented, tested, and sell the Nuvitron devices for diesel engines without understanding auto-mechanics?
    Gary Hammond,

  4. #1184
    Quote Originally Posted by Gary Hammond View Post
    Hi Nuvisys,

    How does this equate with the following quotes?


    So I'm to believe that you invented, tested, and sell the Nuvitron devices for diesel engines without understanding auto-mechanics?
    The devices are for diesel and gasoline engines.

    You are right, sir. Sometimes, I am puzzled why this happened. All my knowledge about automotive mechanics is what i learned from forums and YT (google, too).

    It all started when I came home from nearly 15 years of work in KSA (hf/vhf communications). I came home with a magnetic fuel saver (eco-flow) from UK. I bought a 2nd hand fb300 and installed it. Nothing happened. After travelling more than 150km-200km, the engine noise suddenly became reduced (1/3-1/2). That started it all. No effect on emissions; reduced engine noise and nearly 10% savings (max). One device was invented in 2002, w/ more than 20% savings, the other device in 2004, reduced emissions. In 2008, found out that the two devices were complementing each other (unity of invention). Savings increased to more than 30%.

    On other forums, got a thousand bad comments (BS, horse poo, horse s***, snake oil) They called me a scammer, a fraud, a nut, a mental case, etc. We got the device tested by our environmental management bureau.

    Two or three forums even banned me. Now, our govt is using it for dirty diesel vehicles after testing it. Maybe, Rudolf had guided me all along, after the EU/Germany/France announced that they will phaseout his invention. Most likely, maybe? I mean, the guidance.
    Last edited by nuvisys; 08-25-2019 at 07:43 PM. Reason: spelling

  5. #1185
    Engr. Aaron Murakami, thank you for not banning me. Really appreciate it, sir.
    Last edited by nuvisys; 08-26-2019 at 09:56 PM. Reason: irrelevant post

  6. #1186
    Quote Originally Posted by nuvisys View Post
    OT: First, the good news. Last year, a mining engineer from australia heard about our technology. Since he is a friend of my son, he came to actually see a demo. I presumed, he was impressed. He told us that he is interested to patent the technology in the USA. After getting the papers, signatures, etc..

    I just received the news that it is already filed as a provisionary patent. Wow, a dream come true, since I always wanted to make dpf/egr obsolete. A flawed design, imo. Testing is sked within this year, EPA or CARB and some universities.


    Engr. Aaron Murakami, thank you for not banning me. Really appreciate it, sir.
    Please keep us in the loop with results from EPA & CARB testing. Good luck with the patent process.

  7. #1187
    Imo, I have broken the rules on posting OT comments. I am sorry, I got excited.

  8. #1188
    I'm sure once your patent applications are evaluated and EPA/CARB look at them, you'll go into production and need to market. A new thread would probably be best for those discussions

  9. #1189
    [QUOTE=heysoundude;32173]I'm sure once your patent applications are evaluated and EPA/CARB look at them, you'll go into production and need to market. A new thread would probably be best for those discussions [/QUOTE

    Engr. Aaron's thread has been polluted with OT comments. It's time to go back to plasma ignition. I found a circuit diagram online but our 2002 revo is in such perfect condition comparable to euro 4 compliant cars. If i disable the device's, the emissions will be too pungent (worst than diesel smog), invisible but deadly.

  10. #1190
    Quote Originally Posted by nuvisys View Post
    Engr. Aaron's thread has been polluted with OT comments. It's time to go back to plasma ignition. I found a circuit diagram online but our 2002 revo is in such perfect condition comparable to euro 4 compliant cars. If i disable the device's, the emissions will be too pungent (worst than diesel smog), invisible but deadly.
    These are really quite passive-aggressive trolling statements, you realize.
    are plasma and your devices incompatible? Why? What makes you so sure? If you can't disclose your reasons because of Proprietary technology or trademarked patented confidentiality or whatever, you really have to stop talking about it and talk about your plasma implementation on your car.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •