Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX


ONLY 150 118 90 2 SEATS AVAILABLE! - 2018 ENERGY CONFERENCE

Monero XMR

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: Impedance matching

  1. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Long Beach, California
    Posts
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by Faraday88 View Post
    Impedance Matching is fundamental in power transfer theory in Electrical engineering. if you have an Electrical engineering background in the Circuit theory there is this 'Maximum power transfer theorem' which states that the Maximum power is transfered from the source to the load if the load impedance is a complex conjugate of the source impedance. what this means is stricktly for a Resonant and unity(1) power factor condition. A transformer is typical to match the two impednces between the source and the load.
    This Theorem is applicable here too, the only difference being that in our case here is for a DC power transfer system. and other aspects such as the 'load' being a Battery and the source being an intermidiate stage of the Coils representing the input Battery and hence it should reflect 1:1 coupling.
    The Interaction of the Radiant Electrical excitation is evoked inside-out in the batteries (both the Primary and Secondary) and hence the coupling representing the Impedances should be as close as possible.
    when you start with a virgin formed batteries from the factory, the internal impedence of the battery is lot higher than what you end up after several cycles of Charge -discharge using Radiant Electricity. this lowered impedence is a transfer of the 'lowered' coils impedance reflecting inside the batteries.
    the next question is how do you lower the coils impedence? to answer this question,
    you need to study the various geometrical construction of the coils and their parameters that affect the impedence like say the Tesla's flat-pancake geometry of coils, the number of coils and the number of turns.
    Tesla's taught us how to Increase the Inductance of a coil, whilst reducing its Impedance! (Inductive reactance and so Impedance is a dircet function of its Inductance for a given Frequency) when you deal with the Radiant, you simultaneously alter the DC and AC parameter of a given physical component in an additive manner.
    hope that clears it.
    Rgds,
    Faraday88.
    While I appreciate your apparent knowledge on the subject, I'm betting few people reading here will find your response clear enough for their practical use. Most of what you say here appears to be AC theory, which may be critical to the circuit overall but not in regards to "impedance matching" of the battery to the load.
    Could you not put it in words something like "use the C20 rating to charge or discharge a battery"?
    Please give it another try, Faraday. I'm sure many others besides myself would like to know more about Radiant energy but you need to start out on a much simpler basis.

  2. #32
    Senior Member Faraday88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Bangaluru, Karnataka, India
    Posts
    1,351
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    While I appreciate your apparent knowledge on the subject, I'm betting few people reading here will find your response clear enough for their practical use. Most of what you say here appears to be AC theory, which may be critical to the circuit overall but not in regards to "impedance matching" of the battery to the load.
    Could you not put it in words something like "use the C20 rating to charge or discharge a battery"?
    Please give it another try, Faraday. I'm sure many others besides myself would like to know more about Radiant energy but you need to start out on a much simpler basis.
    Hi Richard,
    Very well, that was a nice and wise suggestion Thank you.
    Look.... i'm no expert either..because research is a continous process of learning and learning and learning!! but yes, over a period of time one certainly gains a level of expertise and know-how of the subject under ponder.
    let me put it in simplest terms and give it try for every one to understand Radiant Electricity.
    AC is Transverse Electromagnetic Field and DC is Longitudial Electromagnetic Field,
    what Tesla found is that both these Field 'mix' to give very strange expanding Field outward that is truely Longitudial in nautre and has the immidiate aether(Vacuum of space) getting a meterialistic charateristics to it. in other words, a virtual entity becoming real and the real entity backing up this virual entity.
    I recommand very one to refer his Patent on the 'methods of Conversion' which is there in PeterL's book FESCE. this is very fundamental experiment to understand what is happening. It is very clear from the Circuit that the Generator has a split function, one AC and the other DC very similar to our SSG/SG circuit. like the Battery for the DC and the Monopole Magnets doing the AC part. Peter likens a similar comparision between this conversion method and EV Gray's conversion tube in the pages following this description.
    There are many variations of how the 'mix' can be capitalised for our benifit but yes if done wrongly...it can counter work to cause damage.
    There have been hundered's of Inventors since Tesla's time that have put Radiant Electricity into application and understood how exactly it behaved under different conditions. the Future of this development is astounding, more because we have had parallel developments in material/ control electronics/devices ect that were not handy to the Inventor of the past including Tesla. It time we give it our best to keep the tourch lit for generations to come.
    Best Regards,
    Faraday88.
    'Teaching can endure a quest for knowledge..but Learning solves an anomaly'

  3. #33
    Senior Member Faraday88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Bangaluru, Karnataka, India
    Posts
    1,351
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    While I appreciate your apparent knowledge on the subject, I'm betting few people reading here will find your response clear enough for their practical use. Most of what you say here appears to be AC theory, which may be critical to the circuit overall but not in regards to "impedance matching" of the battery to the load.
    Could you not put it in words something like "use the C20 rating to charge or discharge a battery"?
    Please give it another try, Faraday. I'm sure many others besides myself would like to know more about Radiant energy but you need to start out on a much simpler basis.
    Hi Richard,
    Very well, that was a nice and wise suggestion Thank you.
    Look.... i'm no expert either..because research is a continous process of learning and learning and learning!! but yes, over a period of time one certainly gains a level of expertise and know-how of the subject under ponder.
    let me put it in simplest terms and give it try for every one to understand Radiant Electricity.
    AC is Transverse Electromagnetic Field and DC is Longitudial Electromagnetic Field,
    what Tesla found is that both these Field 'mix' to give very strange expanding Field outward that is truely Longitudial in nautre and has the immidiate aether(Vacuum of space) getting a meterialistic charateristics to it(like a poping Positron which is a
    Spontaneous particle out of the Vacuum in a Lightning discharge interaction) . in other words, a virtual entity becoming real and the real entity backing up this virual entity.
    I recommand very one to refer his Patent on the 'methods of Conversion' which is there in PeterL's book FESCE. this is very fundamental experiment to understand what is happening. It is very clear from the Circuit that the Generator has a split function, one AC and the other DC very similar to our SSG/SG circuit. like the Battery for the DC and the Monopole Magnets doing the AC part. Peter likens a similar comparision between this conversion method and EV Gray's conversion tube in the pages following this description.
    There are many variations of how the 'mix' can be capitalised for our benifit but yes if done wrongly...it can counter work to cause damage.
    There have been hundered's of Inventors since Tesla's time that have put Radiant Electricity into application and understood how exactly it behaved under different conditions. the Future of this development is astounding, more because we have had parallel developments happening in our times in material/ control electronics/devices ect that were not handy to the Inventor of the past including Tesla. It is time we give it our best to keep the tourch lit for generations to come.
    just my little efforts in making everyone get the gist of the subject.
    Best Regards,
    Faraday88.
    'Teaching can endure a quest for knowledge..but Learning solves an anomaly'

  4. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Long Beach, California
    Posts
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by Faraday88 View Post
    Hi Richard,
    Very well, that was a nice and wise suggestion Thank you.
    Look.... i'm no expert either..because research is a continous process of learning and learning and learning!! but yes, over a period of time one certainly gains a level of expertise and know-how of the subject under ponder.
    let me put it in simplest terms and give it try for every one to understand Radiant Electricity.
    AC is Transverse Electromagnetic Field and DC is Longitudial Electromagnetic Field,
    what Tesla found is that both these Field 'mix' to give very strange expanding Field outward that is truely Longitudial in nautre and has the immidiate aether(Vacuum of space) getting a meterialistic charateristics to it(like a poping Positron which is a
    Spontaneous particle out of the Vacuum in a Lightning discharge interaction) . in other words, a virtual entity becoming real and the real entity backing up this virual entity.
    I recommand very one to refer his Patent on the 'methods of Conversion' which is there in PeterL's book FESCE. this is very fundamental experiment to understand what is happening. It is very clear from the Circuit that the Generator has a split function, one AC and the other DC very similar to our SSG/SG circuit. like the Battery for the DC and the Monopole Magnets doing the AC part. Peter likens a similar comparision between this conversion method and EV Gray's conversion tube in the pages following this description.
    There are many variations of how the 'mix' can be capitalised for our benifit but yes if done wrongly...it can counter work to cause damage.
    There have been hundered's of Inventors since Tesla's time that have put Radiant Electricity into application and understood how exactly it behaved under different conditions. the Future of this development is astounding, more because we have had parallel developments happening in our times in material/ control electronics/devices ect that were not handy to the Inventor of the past including Tesla. It is time we give it our best to keep the tourch lit for generations to come.
    just my little efforts in making everyone get the gist of the subject.
    Best Regards,
    Faraday88.
    So do positrons have something to do with Radiant energy?

  5. #35
    Senior Member Faraday88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Bangaluru, Karnataka, India
    Posts
    1,351
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    So do positrons have something to do with Radiant energy?
    Hi Richard,
    Yes, undoubtedly!! Look its like this.. Only if 'Particle' physicists respected the aetheric physics would they know (or do they?) how much to Particulate the Radiant Event!! It is well known that William Crookes aready had proposed the 'Radiant Matter' way of looking at it. same as calling it as Dark matter or Dark Energy!
    Positron is a mirror image of the electron into the Vacuum of space same as the Nucleus/Proton is the mirror image of the electron into the Vacuum of Time Massivity of Particle comes from the TIME -DOMAIN and Aethericity in Mass comes from the SPATIAL DOMAIN.
    The mechanism of the what is better known as PCR/PCM or Phase conjugate Replica(or mirror) of pumping the Radiant event is well described by Tom Bearden.
    Tesla's Discovery of the Radiant Electricity put him 3-4 hundred years ahead of his time, Imagine Radiant Electricity methods used for Particle accelerator would not only use modest power input but would have incredible Q-factor (Super-Resonant)
    and reduce the size of the Resonant cavity of acceleration...who knows what more it would reveal!! the same is applicable to the Gas-Plasma Fusion reactor and Electrolytic Cold-Fusion cells. I had previously discussed this subject and its suppression/curtailment with Aaron in an Thread here: http://www.energyscienceforum.com/sh...le+accelerator
    Best Regards,
    Faraday88.
    Last edited by Faraday88; 05-27-2018 at 11:43 PM.
    'Teaching can endure a quest for knowledge..but Learning solves an anomaly'

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •