Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX


PRE-REGISTER FOR THE*** 2018 ENERGY CONFERENCE ***

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Magnetoelctromotive generator producing Zero- and Positive Magnetomotive Feedbacks.

  1. #1

    Thumbs up Magnetoelctromotive generator producing Zero- and Positive Magnetomotive Feedbacks.

    DEVELOPMENT OF MAGNETO-ELECTRO-MOTIVE SYSTEMS PRODUCING
    POSITIVE MAGNETO-MOTIVE FEEDBACK AND ELECTRIC CURRENTS.

    https://sites.google.com/site/ageofm...s/a3c-x-magnet

    A3CPMFGCOREVIDEOLINK.jpg

    This is the second part of article explaining testing of various prototypes of magneto-electric
    generators of electric currents showing different efficiency caused by difference of
    constructions and methods. Appears that the same magnet generates more than twice
    stronger EMF when inducing magnetic fields of electromagnetic Coiled U-Core (further: CUC)
    instead of inducing usual electromagnetic Coiled I-Core by moving near same coil, and even
    stronger EMF is inducing when same magnet has flux splitting armature moving near same coil
    with C- and G- shaped Cores. This new methods of generation of electricity also requires less
    mechanical force because that prototypes producing Zero Magneto Motive Feedback (further:
    ZMF) and Positive Magneto Motive Feedback (further: PMF) instead of Negative Magneto
    Motive Feedback usually producing when electricity is generating by moving magnets near
    usual coil with I-Core.

    I would discuss constructions and processes and methods and results of testing,
    also I shall support replication and testing of conceptual prototypes.

    Taras Leskiv

  2. #2
    Senior Member Faraday88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Bangaluru, Karnataka, India
    Posts
    1,100
    Quote Originally Posted by ageofmagnetizm View Post
    DEVELOPMENT OF MAGNETO-ELECTRO-MOTIVE SYSTEMS PRODUCING
    POSITIVE MAGNETO-MOTIVE FEEDBACK AND ELECTRIC CURRENTS.

    https://sites.google.com/site/ageofm...s/a3c-x-magnet

    A3CPMFGCOREVIDEOLINK.jpg

    This is the second part of article explaining testing of various prototypes of magneto-electric
    generators of electric currents showing different efficiency caused by difference of
    constructions and methods. Appears that the same magnet generates more than twice
    stronger EMF when inducing magnetic fields of electromagnetic Coiled U-Core (further: CUC)
    instead of inducing usual electromagnetic Coiled I-Core by moving near same coil, and even
    stronger EMF is inducing when same magnet has flux splitting armature moving near same coil
    with C- and G- shaped Cores. This new methods of generation of electricity also requires less
    mechanical force because that prototypes producing Zero Magneto Motive Feedback (further:
    ZMF) and Positive Magneto Motive Feedback (further: PMF) instead of Negative Magneto
    Motive Feedback usually producing when electricity is generating by moving magnets near
    usual coil with I-Core.

    I would discuss constructions and processes and methods and results of testing,
    also I shall support replication and testing of conceptual prototypes.

    Taras Leskiv
    Hi Taras,
    recently i conceived an idea of similar shaped coil core for the Genny coil used in the SG set up...yet to try out what it does or does it work at all...
    Rgds,
    Faraday88.
    '' A Theory cannot precede a series of Experiments..unless one experiment
    debunks many theories''

  3. #3
    Hi Faraday88,
    however I'm unfamiliar with local slangs and do not know what Genny coil and SG means but suggest that the development of electromagnetic generators is trapped by obvious logic emerged when people learned that coils produces electricity when magnets are moving near coils and they've learned that smaller air gaps increase efficiency of generation... since then it is obviously count-logical to seek higher efficiency by moving magnets far from coils...so it continues with by production of Negative Magnetomotive Feedback. I went around and testing of the same magnets with same coil having different cores has showed nearly 250% increase of efficiency ( not to count Zero Magnetomotive Feedback which still needs to be carefully measured) - such difference in Voltage can not be associating with little errors of usual for such simple equipment.
    Watch it on videos of magnet with coil with short I-Core at:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gki4BFEXE0
    and same magnet with same coil with U-Core at:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLsEZShescU

    Same pendulum and same air gaps but displays of multimeter are so different.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Faraday88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Bangaluru, Karnataka, India
    Posts
    1,100
    Quote Originally Posted by ageofmagnetizm View Post
    Hi Faraday88,
    however I'm unfamiliar with local slangs and do not know what Genny coil and SG means but suggest that the development of electromagnetic generators is trapped by obvious logic emerged when people learned that coils produces electricity when magnets are moving near coils and they've learned that smaller air gaps increase efficiency of generation... since then it is obviously count-logical to seek higher efficiency by moving magnets far from coils...so it continues with by production of Negative Magnetomotive Feedback. I went around and testing of the same magnets with same coil having different cores has showed nearly 250% increase of efficiency ( not to count Zero Magnetomotive Feedback which still needs to be carefully measured) - such difference in Voltage can not be associating with little errors of usual for such simple equipment.
    Watch it on videos of magnet with coil with short I-Core at:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gki4BFEXE0
    and same magnet with same coil with U-Core at:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLsEZShescU

    Same pendulum and same air gaps but displays of multimeter are so different.
    Hi ,
    Genny coil is noting but Generator coil... nothing special..multifilar coil wired in series coupled to SG machine and intended to back charge the primary Batteries in pulses..this uses the 27% mechanical Energy coneveretd into Electrical for the recovery.
    Rgds,
    Faraday88.
    '' A Theory cannot precede a series of Experiments..unless one experiment
    debunks many theories''

  5. #5
    Hi, thanks for the feeds on Genny coil, I've also searched for meaning of the "SG" and found Bedini SG, if you mean that.
    It is interesting to go deeply into that design but just viewing of images

    https://www.google.com.ua/search?
    q=Bedini+SG&newwindow=1&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ &sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwif7ZaJ5IvUAhVhMJoKHQDkDJoQsAQIHw& biw=1280&bih=907

    shows that there same magnets moving near same usual coils and
    if coils will have U-Cores secured around moving magnets so that magnets will be moving through U-Cores far from coils... -
    then yes, it will be mine design and it shall increases output and reduces load necessary for continuous revolution.

    That is what my invention is about: why keep building inefficient generators producing Negative Magnetomotive Feedback if
    Positive Magnetomotive Feedback can be achieved by little increase of diameter of generator and little increase of costs of cores of coils.

    Thanks for guiding me onto interesting design of SG, I shall be reading about it.

  6. #6
    Hi Faraday88,
    previously you've posted:

    "recently i conceived an idea of similar shaped coil core for the Genny coil used in the SG set up...yet to try out what it does or does it work at all..."

    have you already tried how that similar shaped coil core works? It will be nice to see the results and discuss them here,
    I'll also post on my website the link to your video or what ever explanation you'll have about your experimental testing.
    Last edited by ageofmagnetizm; 05-28-2017 at 04:49 AM. Reason: grammati ommision

  7. #7
    Senior Member Faraday88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Bangaluru, Karnataka, India
    Posts
    1,100
    Quote Originally Posted by ageofmagnetizm View Post
    Hi, thanks for the feeds on Genny coil, I've also searched for meaning of the "SG" and found Bedini SG, if you mean that.
    It is interesting to go deeply into that design but just viewing of images

    https://www.google.com.ua/search?
    q=Bedini+SG&newwindow=1&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ &sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwif7ZaJ5IvUAhVhMJoKHQDkDJoQsAQIHw& biw=1280&bih=907

    shows that there same magnets moving near same usual coils and
    if coils will have U-Cores secured around moving magnets so that magnets will be moving through U-Cores far from coils... -
    then yes, it will be mine design and it shall increases output and reduces load necessary for continuous revolution.

    That is what my invention is about: why keep building inefficient generators producing Negative Magnetomotive Feedback if
    Positive Magnetomotive Feedback can be achieved by little increase of diameter of generator and little increase of costs of cores of coils.

    Thanks for guiding me onto interesting design of SG, I shall be reading about it.
    Hi,
    I suggest you start reading from John Bedini website (old site) to get an insight into the Motor/Generator aspects of Electromagnetics this is how even i started way back in 2004!
    Rgds,
    Faraday88.
    '' A Theory cannot precede a series of Experiments..unless one experiment
    debunks many theories''

  8. #8
    Have you already tried how that similar shaped coil core works? If not - why have you changing your intention?

  9. #9
    Senior Member Faraday88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Bangaluru, Karnataka, India
    Posts
    1,100
    Quote Originally Posted by ageofmagnetizm View Post
    Have you already tried how that similar shaped coil core works? If not - why have you changing your intention?
    Hi,
    Sorry for answering so late... i did not see your posting..do'nt know why!!!
    I have yet to try out the configuration however shall definitely share once i am through the trials.. basically it is boosted form of the Generator/Energiser Coils for back charging the primary battery in the SG circuit. when you incorporate these, you thoroughly make use of the remining 27 % of mehanical Energy being fed back into the primary battrey, which in turn reflect into throughly charging of the secondaries as well!!
    Rgds,
    Faraday88.
    '' A Theory cannot precede a series of Experiments..unless one experiment
    debunks many theories''

  10. #10
    Hi,
    No rush at all, I've just thought if I can provide informational support about building of complex long cores of flux-splitting armatures or any hardware explaining in my reports - than you just right about it here, and everybody can do so once experimenting with coils having U- C- G- or similar cores or complex multipolar magnets.

    keep updating about achieving improvements.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •