Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX


PRE-REGISTER FOR THE*** 2018 ENERGY CONFERENCE ***

Page 27 of 28 FirstFirst ... 1725262728 LastLast
Results 261 to 270 of 273

Thread: Zero Force Motor Replication Project

  1. #261
    Hi James,

    Okay, I understand. I think with the rectangular magnets the N-S poles of the directly adjacent magnets cannot fully 'join' their lines of flux as thoroughly as in the case of the cylinder magnets, this can explain the 1.5 inch flux leakage from the iron cube towards the shaft. I think this is the explanation while it is okay that these 2 inch by 1 inch rectangular N52 magnets are certainly stronger than the N52 3/4 inch OD cylinder ones witht he same 1/2 inch thickness.
    I think if we had four 2 inch OD cylinder magnets (N52), then the 1.5 inch long leakage in the shaft would be much shorter or non existent (or non detectable by the same indicator) because of the regular cylinder shape. With the 2" x 1" rectangular shape there is much less symmetry from "lines of flux joinings" point of view

    Thanks for showiing the video.

    Gyula

  2. #262
    Senior Member James McDonald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Odenton, Maryland
    Posts
    117
    Quote Originally Posted by Gyula View Post
    Hi James,

    Okay, I understand. I think with the rectangular magnets the N-S poles of the directly adjacent magnets cannot fully 'join' their lines of flux as thoroughly as in the case of the cylinder magnets, this can explain the 1.5 inch flux leakage from the iron cube towards the shaft. I think this is the explanation while it is okay that these 2 inch by 1 inch rectangular N52 magnets are certainly stronger than the N52 3/4 inch OD cylinder ones witht he same 1/2 inch thickness.
    I think if we had four 2 inch OD cylinder magnets (N52), then the 1.5 inch long leakage in the shaft would be much shorter or non existent (or non detectable by the same indicator) because of the regular cylinder shape. With the 2" x 1" rectangular shape there is much less symmetry from "lines of flux joinings" point of view

    Thanks for showing the video.

    Gyula

    Hi Gyula --

    As promised a new video of the Zero Force Motor rotor and shaft and what different strength and size N52 Neo magnets do
    to the rotor and shaft. Yesterday's video had one magnet not glued on at the time allowing the South Pole to show all the way down
    the shaft.

    Enjoy!!!


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrIlDdh7YPU


    -- James

  3. #263
    Hi James,

    Okay, and thanks for showing the new test.

    With the fourth magnet in place the 2 like and 2 unlike poles can mostly 'join' within the body of the iron rotor.

    An interesting thing to consider would be that if there is no iron rotor but a non magnetizable rotor body for holding the 4 magnets in the same place, and the shaft would also be non magnetizable, the same 2 -2 poles would invariably join together inside the space the 4 magnets 'encapsulate', the drawback possibly would be that more unwanted flux could leak out and could negatively interact with the stator coils.

    Gyula

  4. #264
    Senior Member Yaro1776's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Heart of Vermont
    Posts
    219

    YZFM with 1"Dx3/8"T Neo's and 48v

    A full battery of testing was completed for the rotor Neo upgrade (1"Dx3/8"T) using firing durations of 45 to 70 degrees, advance of 10 to 45 degrees and voltages of 12v, 24v, 36v and 48v. A complete menu of results that now describe the operational characteristics of the machine. Some of these results were desribed in the previous post.

    The addition of the 48 volt operation was an eye opener when tested against the 36v mode. The 48v mode cranked up the amperage, speed and torque.
    For example at 40-45 degree advance:
    45 degree firing duration - 36v at 8000 RPM with 0.71A and 48v at 11014 RPM with 0.81A
    60 degree firing duration - 36v at 11140 RPM with1.10A and 48v at 12410 RPM with 1.02A
    70 degree firing duration -36v at 11600 with with 1.08A and 48v at 12800 RPM with 1.30A

    The 1" Neo's do make the motor a bit more touchy at the higher advances and the position of the timing rotor and reed mount needs to be tweaked to achieve the best separation distance. The motor also appears to gain strength after running for an extended period of time, in that the amps will drop off while the RPM increases.

    The 48 volt operation is a bit on the wild side. I had anticipated a greater gain in speed, perhaps close to 14000 RPM, but there appears to be a wall around 12800 RPM. The machine is not really happy operating at this speed and voltage, and it continually screams and complains about being held back. It wants to do more but something is not quite right in the tuning or hardware.

    You can note in the video at 48 volts that the on screen amperage readings are offset to the the negative side - they are mostly below the 0 amp axis. In a separate test removing one leg of the reed firing circuit causes the amp value to read -1.06A (clamp on meter) with the speed dropping off to 12056 RPM. Switching to the other reed causes the amp value to read +0.60A with the speed dropping off to 11300. Stopping the motor and the restarting brings the values back to nearly the same readings. So running on half the circuit yields some fairly significant numbers. There is an instability and imbalance here for sure.

    There are other peculiarities that have been observed and noted, but these are beyond the scope of this post.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5h_H...ature=youtu.be

    Check out the video if you are so inclined and ride a bit on the wild side.

    Water pump test video next,
    Yaro

  5. #265
    Senior Member Yaro1776's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Heart of Vermont
    Posts
    219

    ZFM with Water Pump

    From the very beginning of this replication one of the primary goals was to demonstrate that the ZFM design concept is capable of performing work in the real world - in this instance pumping water. While the ZFM is a capable high RPM machine would it pump water? The overall torque of the YZFM has improved dramatically since the humble beginnings, but is it enough to drive a 4000 RPM pump, albeit that the pump speed is way low in comparison to the normal 10,000-12,000 RPM capabilities.

    So to start, the ZFM is being asked to work outside of its normal operational zone, in reality the motor should have been outfitted with a speed reducing belt drive for best efficiency. Well all that was easily available was a 12 volt Harbor Freight utility pump, not a great performance fit, but workable. The ZFM shaft was modified nearly a year ago to accept this pump and recently the pump assembly was united with the ZFM.

    Really the expectations were rather low for this test and no earth shattering performance was expected. So the performance figures are not anything great, but they are enough to show that the machine and pump assembly, albeit in a crude state will function and perform real work. That is the point here.

    Basic performance data:
    70 degree firing duration and 35-40 degree advance
    24V at 2270 RPM with 2.16A and 2.3 GPM
    36v at 2500 RPM with 2.82A and 3.0 GPM
    48v at 3250 RPM and 3.38A and 3.4 GPM

    The flow rates were relatively simple to calculate using a 5 gallon Lowes bucket and timing the fill to determine the true flow GPM (The Lowes bucket was filled to the brim and weighed for the capacity calc). The entire assembly was fairly sensitive to alignment and hose loading, but playing around with this gave relatively consistent results.

    The highest amperage draw was observed at 48v with a 5 psig back pressure on the pump (using the ball valve to reduce the flow area) - this drove the amperage to 4.8 A and lowered the speed to 1535 RPM. For 36 volts the machine nearly stalled at about the same amperage. Both coils heated up rapidly - not ideal for the plastic housing.

    So, while the performance was no better and less than a standard motor/pump assembly, though the ZFM was operated well outside of its speed range - well it did work.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3fO-IQpPI8

    This experiment then ends the YZFM replication project. On the horizon in late fall are the performance efficiency tests (COP) utilizing a Prony brake or similar method. Time for a hiatus for the last couple of months of summer. There are other ZFM fish to fry in the near future.

    Thank you for your attention and encouragement,
    Yaro

  6. #266
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Long Beach, California
    Posts
    41
    "From the very beginning of this replication one of the primary goals was to demonstrate that the ZFM design concept is capable of performing work in the real world "
    Hi Yaro.
    I thought the purpose was to determine if the ZFM was overunity, But John Bedini published 118% around 1989 so where are we now?

  7. #267
    Senior Member Yaro1776's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Heart of Vermont
    Posts
    219
    Hey Richard thanks for the reply,

    You will note that I stated "one of the primary goals" in my latest post. I have not published, to date, any information with respect to the efficiency for energy performance of the ZFM. The term "over unity" is not relevant to this machine since it is an "open system" design, and therefore, the term COP is applicable. An important point!

    If any information is to be published on this type of energy efficiency, it will be done with solid information, data and other replicated efforts. This is the only way that I will approach it. So it is a moot point of discussion for the time being until all is thoroughly proofed and vetted. This is just good science and practice.

    Be assured that once these power efficiency tests have been completed and proofed that the results will be published - be they good, bad or indifferent.

    Sit back and enjoy the ride or better yet, become engaged,
    Yaro

  8. #268
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Long Beach, California
    Posts
    41
    Nice work, Yaro.

  9. #269
    Hi guys, this is Chad on RS's computer. I'm up at his shop for a few days.. We are working on all the projects for the museum. Right now I'm working on a hand crank generator. I'm looking for all the tricks in lowering Lenz drag in generator mode under load. My question here is, have you had a chance or the ability to manually spin up a ZFM using a drill, or any other prime mover...? I'm curious if the ZFM can generate voltage and current, and if so, does the load take off put resistance on the prime mover, and make it pull more current...? We understand that the ZFM is a bloch wall motor.. Is the ZFM also a BLOCH wall generator...??
    Last edited by RS_; 08-15-2017 at 05:44 PM.

  10. #270
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Long Beach, California
    Posts
    41
    Quote Originally Posted by RS_ View Post
    Hi guys, this is Chad on RS's computer. I'm up at his shop for a few days.. We are working on all the projects for the museum. Right now I'm working on a hand crank generator. I'm looking for all the tricks in lowering Lenz drag in generator mode under load. My question here is, have you had a chance or the ability to manually spin up a ZFM using a drill, or any other prime mover...? I'm curious if the ZFM can generate voltage and current, and if so, does the load take off put resistance on the prime mover, and make it pull more current...? We understand that the ZFM is a bloch wall motor.. Is the ZFM also a BLOCH wall generator...??
    You would be generating AC out. The driver transistors would not rectify the "output". You would not be connected to a battery under the conditions you described. While I believe it would output voltage/current, my question is what would the COP be?
    This is speculation on my part as I don't have a ZFM to try it out.
    Richard Gieser

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •