Theory of the electron magnetic dipole moment.
Most take the approach to life under the axiom “six of one and a half dozen of the other,” while a few select of the human race have more inquiring minds wanting the particular's; probing ever deeper into whatever the subject is at hand searching for the ever elusive electron magnetic dipole moment in life which is what we do here on the Energy Science Forum best!
Cutting to the chase
Recently it was implied to me by way of private communication from a respected forum member that this thread (Achieving Over Unity With a Empty Coffee Cup) was in some way related to a 'galvanic battery' Now I suppose that one could misconstrue my suggestions, interpreting them as such as there are some similarities it has to be admitted, but rather than coming out into the light and debating the matter (which is what we do on this forum), I was left for several days to ponder the innuendos impliedly implied by the comparison of the 'galvanic battery' in relationship to the experimental magnetron circuit proper, that were building on this thread, I was left to my own confusion wondering in the dark to draw my own conclusions by the suggestion.
The Pauli Principle - Postulate One
“It has been shown that the Pauli exclusion principle is responsible for the fact that ordinary bulk matter is stable and occupies volume. This suggestion was first made in 1931 by Paul Ehrenfest, who pointed out that the electrons of each atom cannot all fall into the lowest-energy orbital and must occupy successively larger shells. Atoms therefore occupy a volume and cannot be squeezed too closely together.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle
This statement postulates that negative and positive electrons in a dipole, cannot “fall into their lowest energy orbit,” but “must occupy” successively “larger spaces.” It has been suggested by other that the Stubblefield Earth Battery in use with time, sic “grows”, this has been suggested most notably by John Bedini.
I postulate that the experimental circuit as suggested here on this thread meets the following requirements for an electromagnetic field performing in essence the same function/s as a Stubblefield Earth Battery.
That if empirically any battery powered circuit that has not been properly maintained - to the point that the original batteries are dried out and are corroded, but the “originally,” battery powered circuit continues to operate, then that circuit has in fact sic grown, through the auspices of the “Pauli Exclusion Principle.”
In conclusion it is denied that the suggested experimental circuit due to it use of dissimilar metal in it's Earth Plates forming a zinc anode and a copper cathode are related to the semblance of a galvanic battery. While one may confuse themselves by pondering such suggestion, the anecdotal reports of old telegraph lines improperly maintained are still fully operational one hundred years later; it is too compelling to believe that these wires are being powered by electro chemical principles alone.
The analogy holds that if an electron indeed behaves like a tiny bar magnet. Then the only consequence that can account for this is that an external electro magnetic field exerts a torque on the electron magnetic moment in the experimental circuit depending on its state of equilibrium with respect to the field.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks