Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The 3d Monopole Coil How To Build

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Faraday88
    replied
    Originally posted by James_Somewhere_In_Idaho View Post
    Hi Faraday88

    I appreciate your theories, as always. However, Patrick's "Lego swing spike kicker" video is a practical demonstration of using the capacitor connected to both ends of the inductor (as it is suggested on John's FEG diagram).

    Please re-review Patrick's video, and maybe the one he posted on his You Tube site prior to that one, and tell me what you think.

    If one were to perfect what I am proposing, one could use that device to power another wheel with low drag generators or maybe a Kromrey device, with very little energy expenditure...

    And, just like the (long ago) experiments where one places "grandfather clocks" next to each other, and they end up oscillating in unison, why not use the same principal with nature's frequency oscillations...that is all I am saying...it just seems to me that would make practical sense...

    And, while I no longer post my applications of John's (and other's) technology here, my ideas have been working...however, you will never hear me "claim" that my builds do anything other than charge batteries REALLY good...

    And, as for asking John B (and others) the hard questions about this technology (referencing interactions found in earlier posts of this thread), I think we have seen where that got us all...

    Just FYI in regard to those who have gone dark on this subject: I have followed John's work since the "School Girl" article. My (now deceased) best friend Jonathan and I discussed the possibilities. He actually visited John B's shop back then, and John showed him his "shop full of toys". Jonathan reported back to me that they all worked as reported. My friend Jonathan was ex-Naval Intelligence (who knew things that made him constantly look over his shoulder). One of his best friends was James Wesley Rawles. Jonathan played a big part in James' first novel. Between James (ex-Army Intelligence) and Jonathan, they had a large group of acquaintances back in DC who formed a sort of informal intelligence group for them. Jonathan warned me that whenever one sees a"movement" (such as a "patriot" movement, or even so-called "free energy" movement), the powers that be, either places their insiders as the leaders, or puts them right next to the leaders of said movement. One can recognize them as the ones who whisper in the ears of the leaders and control the disbursement of information. They play that part of "trusted individuals", however, they are really logging information on who really counts in such a movement. That is why I became suspicious when the certain individuals went dark on this thread. I saw where the above mentioned "certain individuals" computers were evidentially hacked, and then certain other individuals "helped" them. From that point forward, neither of those individuals would interact with me. and that is also when they stopped discussing ideas on this thread. I then took any/all references of my work in this area off of this site, as I now have my suspicions as to what might be going on in the background. That is all I will say on the matter, other than WATCH YOUR BACK!
    Hi James,
    very well Sir! i am delighted to here the 'inside stories' and i have sensed similar things happening couple of years ago.(do not want to mention about some in this group) i must admit that i have lost a lot of time without experiments..but of late i'm back on track..i need to prove experimental demos here in the group which i'm confident that i shall soon do so..however, one real startling aspect between theory and experiment takes us back to Tesla himself! and more startling thing is that they bear the similar 'broken symmetry' as between The Matter and the Aether!!(NO PUN INTENDED) while it is imperative to go the experiment way first (as Tesla always said), the Theory part actually leads you to another aspect or Manifestation of your pursuit.
    Tesla had a unique approach of doing both of these in tandem.
    One such experiment is Tesla's Original Colorado-spring Experiment i for sure would want to demonstrate here to the group (if not any body else,) and this is based on Peter's FESCE book. Peter's writings in that book have been Monumental inspiration to me about the Phenomenon.
    Best Regards,
    Faraday88.

    Leave a comment:


  • James_Somewhere_In_Idaho
    replied
    Hi Faraday88

    I appreciate your theories, as always. However, Patrick's "Lego swing spike kicker" video is a practical demonstration of using the capacitor connected to both ends of the inductor (as it is suggested on John's FEG diagram).

    Please re-review Patrick's video, and maybe the one he posted on his You Tube site prior to that one, and tell me what you think.

    If one were to perfect what I am proposing, one could use that device to power another wheel with low drag generators or maybe a Kromrey device, with very little energy expenditure...

    And, just like the (long ago) experiments where one places "grandfather clocks" next to each other, and they end up oscillating in unison, why not use the same principal with nature's frequency oscillations...that is all I am saying...it just seems to me that would make practical sense...

    And, while I no longer post my applications of John's (and other's) technology here, my ideas have been working...however, you will never hear me "claim" that my builds do anything other than charge batteries REALLY good...

    And, as for asking John B (and others) the hard questions about this technology (referencing interactions found in earlier posts of this thread), I think we have seen where that got us all...

    Just FYI in regard to those who have gone dark on this subject: I have followed John's work since the "School Girl" article. My (now deceased) best friend Jonathan and I discussed the possibilities. He actually visited John B's shop back then, and John showed him his "shop full of toys". Jonathan reported back to me that they all worked as reported. My friend Jonathan was ex-Naval Intelligence (who knew things that made him constantly look over his shoulder). One of his best friends was James Wesley Rawles. Jonathan played a big part in James' first novel. Between James (ex-Army Intelligence) and Jonathan, they had a large group of acquaintances back in DC who formed a sort of informal intelligence group for them. Jonathan warned me that whenever one sees a"movement" (such as a "patriot" movement, or even so-called "free energy" movement), the powers that be, either places their insiders as the leaders, or puts them right next to the leaders of said movement. One can recognize them as the ones who whisper in the ears of the leaders and control the disbursement of information. They play that part of "trusted individuals", however, they are really logging information on who really counts in such a movement. That is why I became suspicious when the certain individuals went dark on this thread. I saw where the above mentioned "certain individuals" computers were evidentially hacked, and then certain other individuals "helped" them. From that point forward, neither of those individuals would interact with me. and that is also when they stopped discussing ideas on this thread. I then took any/all references of my work in this area off of this site, as I now have my suspicions as to what might be going on in the background. That is all I will say on the matter, other than WATCH YOUR BACK!
    Last edited by James_Somewhere_In_Idaho; 07-20-2016, 06:53 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Faraday88
    replied
    Originally posted by James_Somewhere_In_Idaho View Post
    Hi Faraday88

    Well, I'll try to answer your question simply...

    When looking at the diagram in question, notice the capacitor(s) attached to both poles of the coils (inductors). Does that not look a lot like Patrick's Lego swing "spike kicker"? Of course, the diagram leaves out how it is controlled...does it not?

    Now look at Patrick's version of the motor that he posted after I inferred the possible connection way back in this thread. It is a three inductor motor, powered by his "kicker mod" in place of the controller switching reference on the original diagram.

    One can determine frequency with an inductance/capacitance formula...I'm suggesting running the zero-force motor with Patrick's spike kicker circuit running at one of nature's inherent harmonic frequencies (a harmonic of the Earth's resonant frequency) and see if that provides an extra push on the "swing" so-to-speak.

    The diagram of John's original zero-force motor was merely a reference point to what I was attempting to infer.

    However, I am probably speaking non-sense, as most people on here believe my suggestions are not worth looking into...and hey, I'm not claiming that I know anything...it's just an intuitive feeling of how things might work better. I'll leave the technical things to you more intelligent folks...

    Be blessed.
    Hi James,
    Fair enough! i was just trying to peep into your mind and see how you think how it is! However i was also trying to co-relate it to how i thought about that particular diagram in what it 'represented'. well, remember the low drag Generator talked about in the advanced SSG book of PeterL and Aaron M.
    By what i tinkered on it ,it looks to me as though the 'Capacitors' are merely Symbolic representations and NOT physical placement across the Energiser coils..!! what say?
    the IDEA IS TO MAKE THE COILS PLAY THE ROLE OF A CAPACITOR!!!!!THIS IS THE REAL SECRET OF A DRAG LESS GENERATOR!! once you do that you have opened the window to the phi dot current, that charges your Batteries devoid of electron current (mass) and pure Potential or the Radiant Potential(dot phi).
    more later,
    Best Regards,
    Faraday88.

    Leave a comment:


  • James_Somewhere_In_Idaho
    replied
    Hi Faraday88

    Well, I'll try to answer your question simply...

    When looking at the diagram in question, notice the capacitor(s) attached to both poles of the coils (inductors). Does that not look a lot like Patrick's Lego swing "spike kicker"? Of course, the diagram leaves out how it is controlled...does it not?

    Now look at Patrick's version of the motor that he posted after I inferred the possible connection way back in this thread. It is a three inductor motor, powered by his "kicker mod" in place of the controller switching reference on the original diagram.

    One can determine frequency with an inductance/capacitance formula...I'm suggesting running the zero-force motor with Patrick's spike kicker circuit running at one of nature's inherent harmonic frequencies (a harmonic of the Earth's resonant frequency) and see if that provides an extra push on the "swing" so-to-speak.

    The diagram of John's original zero-force motor was merely a reference point to what I was attempting to infer.

    However, I am probably speaking non-sense, as most people on here believe my suggestions are not worth looking into...and hey, I'm not claiming that I know anything...it's just an intuitive feeling of how things might work better. I'll leave the technical things to you more intelligent folks...

    Be blessed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Faraday88
    replied
    Originally posted by James_Somewhere_In_Idaho View Post
    Hi Reggie

    As I expected. The important information would not be brought up. Here are two videos for you. They were the last topics before those involved went dark. Lets see if you can come to the same conclusion as I have:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPUajezZUng#t=24

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41cfHcb7qd8

    I have attached diagrams of a zero-force motor, and of Patrick's "spike kicker" idea we had talked about in the thread, showing how these ideas could be used together. Also consider "frequency" when designing these. There are frequencies inherent in nature. This is where Patrick's CPD mod can come in handy. Patrick's mod is merely a series L parallel RC circuit useful for causing a determined frequency in a circuit. I have also attached a circuit diagram of how that looks

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]5440[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]5438[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]5439[/ATTACH]

    When one considers that a coil can be an inductor, one can experiment with the inductance of the drive coils in Patrick's first diagram to better take advantage of "natures push" on the swing-set (the spike) that drives the motor. If it were me, I would pattern it after the two coil zero force motor in the first video, with Patrick's "spike kicker" mod driving it at one of nature's frequencies...like 2060.8 Hz? That is up to you if you want to continue down that line of experiemnts. Just know, you probably shouldn't publish anything about it...just saying...be blessed...

    Hi James,

    what emphasis do you put using the first schematic (Bedini's FEG book schematic) schematic..?
    Rgds,
    Faraday88.

    Leave a comment:


  • James_Somewhere_In_Idaho
    replied
    Hi Reggie

    As I expected. The important information would not be brought up. Here are two videos for you. They were the last topics before those involved went dark. Lets see if you can come to the same conclusion as I have:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPUajezZUng#t=24

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41cfHcb7qd8

    I have attached diagrams of a zero-force motor, and of Patrick's "spike kicker" idea we had talked about in the thread, showing how these ideas could be used together. Also consider "frequency" when designing these. There are frequencies inherent in nature. This is where Patrick's CPD mod can come in handy. Patrick's mod is merely a series L parallel RC circuit useful for causing a determined frequency in a circuit. I have also attached a circuit diagram of how that looks



    When one considers that a coil can be an inductor, one can experiment with the inductance of the drive coils in Patrick's first diagram to better take advantage of "natures push" on the swing-set (the spike) that drives the motor. If it were me, I would pattern it after the two coil zero force motor in the first video, with Patrick's "spike kicker" mod driving it at one of nature's frequencies...like 2060.8 Hz? That is up to you if you want to continue down that line of experiemnts. Just know, you probably shouldn't publish anything about it...just saying...be blessed...
    Last edited by James_Somewhere_In_Idaho; 07-17-2016, 10:17 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Yaro1776
    replied
    Originally posted by ReggieGM3 View Post
    To anyone who attended the 2016 conference,
    Did John Bedini discuss the status of the 3D Monopole Kits he proposed last August?
    Hey Reggie,

    There were no public discussions or disclosures of the 3D Monople Kit - not aware if it was brought up in private discussions. Check with Tom at Teslagenx for any possible future kits. Most of the early discussions on this thread were on the easy spin type. If you Google Zero Force Motor, and watch the 14 minute video there appear to be a couple of small versions running of this concept.

    Regards,
    Yaro
    Last edited by Yaro1776; 07-17-2016, 02:33 AM. Reason: Typo

    Leave a comment:


  • James_Somewhere_In_Idaho
    replied
    Hi ReggieGM3

    I wouldn't hold your breath. If you look back in this thread, you will see where there was a lot of encouragement and information given for building these "little" motors. John even said he would be meeting with me "soon" at one point. I had hoped to ask some important questions that would have helped me become more energy independent. However, something happened at that time--probably several computers were hacked (my only explanation) and then everyone with relevance on the topic went dark. I tried asking questions and tried PM'ing some of these people, but they avoided me like the plague. I suspect the leading contributor(s) was (were) threatened. I have literally lost any faith in REAL USEFUL information being given out, here. In regard to the conference, I have limited income and would never be able to afford going to it, and the videos only elude to information that would need to be found by doing expensive experiments, few can afford. Probably, your best bet would be to read the three SG manuals, and the earlier posts on this thread (before certain individuals went dark), and hope you stumble onto something before the power goes off for good. That is what I'm doing. Best of luck...

    Leave a comment:


  • ReggieGM3
    replied
    Status of the 3D Monopole Kits

    To anyone who attended the 2016 conference,
    Did John Bedini discuss the status of the 3D Monopole Kits he proposed last August?

    Leave a comment:


  • Notsure
    replied
    I used 25 and 30 gauge wire. I said impedance because it's not resistance, using a resistor won't work. Don't know exactly why this works better but it does. The improvement of the series parallel connections is that now the coil has magnetic direction. It's more like a solenoid, instead of pushing the magnet out or pulling it in, it moves it right or left, up or down. Flipping the coil around doesn't change direction of the magnet, only polarity of the current does. It doesn't matter what position the magnet is to the coil either. I would like to try it with a piece of iron instead of a magnet and see if it's any different.
    I don't think anybody knows the physics here, me either. Just theories. Only observations on what happens. Pancake coil has no hole in the center, the conical coil is all about the hole. I think basically it's about compression and expansion.
    Last edited by Notsure; 05-24-2016, 05:26 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Faraday88
    replied
    Originally posted by Notsure View Post
    In case there is anybody experimenting with conical coils, I found a way to improve it. Make it as wide as it is long, air core, wide ends together. Bifilar each end with one low impedance wire, one high. Put these in series, then both sides in parallel. It works.

    Hi Notsure,

    What do you mean by saying, one high impedance wire and the other low impedance wire...do you mean to say they are of different sizes..?
    What similarity does Conical coil structure with the Flat pancake coil (Tesla's Patent)..?
    Rgds,
    Faraday88.

    Leave a comment:


  • Notsure
    replied
    In case there is anybody experimenting with conical coils, I found a way to improve it. Make it as wide as it is long, air core, wide ends together. Bifilar each end with one low impedance wire, one high. Put these in series, then both sides in parallel. It works.

    Leave a comment:


  • Notsure
    replied
    I found out something interesting about this wheel. I didn't work with just a single coil. Pulsing a single coil barely moved it. So I would have to fire multiple coils in parallel or design a stronger coil, either way it would eat more amperage. I'm not sure of the physics of this but probably is weight against gravity. I changed it to only two magnets and I had the same power to move the wheel with only one coil I had when it wasn't connected to a motor and it was horizontal. So why not use multiple coils and build a DC version of a rotating magnetic field?

    Leave a comment:


  • Notsure
    replied
    I'm going to try using a energizer to spin a D.C. motor. Never tried this before. Nineteen inch diameter, on a motor from a treadmill. It already had a flywheel, should work like a harmonic balancer. The motor has drag to it of course but it got enough leverage it shouldn't take much from a coil. It will take me awhile to finish it, just wanted to show the printed wheel. Click image for larger version

Name:	DC motor.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	96.0 KB
ID:	48864 Click image for larger version

Name:	dc motor specs.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	91.9 KB
ID:	48865

    Leave a comment:


  • Notsure
    replied
    Nice, I'll have to try it. I kind of got side tracked for awhile. I was trying stuff with spark gaps on a smaller machine. I went for real high speed using mosfet and cap. got it up to 250V no amps of course. Not good for battery charging but I was trying to see what effect the spin forces have on radiant energy magnetically. My conclusion was you need mass. When it's small it collapses on itself all the time. Makes me want to try spinning coils instead of magnets.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X